48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20137352)
1. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.
Svahn TM; Chakraborty DP; Ikeda D; Zackrisson S; Do Y; Mattsson S; Andersson I
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):e1074-82. PubMed ID: 22674710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.
Malich A; Fischer DR; Facius M; Petrovitch A; Boettcher J; Marx C; Hansch A; Kaiser WA
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15827823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Artificial Intelligence Beat Humans in Detecting Breast Malignancy on Mammograms?
Malik M; Yasmin S; Kumar A; Hassan Y; Rizvi Y; Iffat
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e46208. PubMed ID: 37908910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced Detection of Suspicious Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Automated Breast Ultrasound in 117 Patients with Core Needle Biopsy.
Pawlak M; Rudnicki W; Brandt Ł; Dobrowolska M; Borkowska A; Szpor J; Łuczyńska E
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Sep; 29():e941072. PubMed ID: 37689969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Sohns C; Scherrer M; Staab W; Obenauer S
Eur Radiol; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2475-83. PubMed ID: 21805368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image processing can cause some malignant soft-tissue lesions to be missed in digital mammography images.
Warren LM; Halling-Brown MD; Looney PT; Dance DR; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Wilkinson L; McAvinchey R; Young KC
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):799.e1-799.e8. PubMed ID: 28457521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A single-institution retrospective evaluation of noninvasive localization for non-palpable breast microcalcification.
Li Y; Li M; Zhang Y
Asian J Surg; 2024 Apr; 47(4):1776-1780. PubMed ID: 38143169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Mass Detection and Classification Using Machine Learning Approaches on Two-Dimensional Mammogram: A Review.
Shankari N; Kudva V; Hegde RB
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2024; 52(4):41-60. PubMed ID: 38780105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial neural networks in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision making.
Ayer T; Chen Q; Burnside ES
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():832509. PubMed ID: 23781276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography cancer detection: comparison of single 8MP and pair of 5MP reporting monitors.
Strudley CJ; Young KC; Warren LM
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170246. PubMed ID: 29436850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations of mammography in the diagnosis of breast diseases compared with ultrasonography: a single-center retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
Zhao H; Zou L; Geng X; Zheng S
Eur J Med Res; 2015 Apr; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 25896757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.
Ekpo EU; Alakhras M; Brennan P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 29479948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-MicroRNA Analysis Can Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Mammography in Determining Breast Cancer Risk.
Song JE; Jang JY; Kang KN; Jung JS; Kim CW; Kim AS
Breast J; 2023; 2023():9117047. PubMed ID: 38178922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full-field digital mammography: the '30% rule' and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast.
Strohbach J; Wilkinson JM; Spuur KM
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):177-184. PubMed ID: 32567806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
