These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20137352)

  • 1. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
    Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
    Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited value of scintimammography and contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of microcalcification detected by mammography.
    Tiling R; Khalkhali I; Sommer H; Linke R; Moser R; Willemsen F; Pfluger T; Tatsch K; Hahn K
    Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Jan; 19(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 9515547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
    Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
    Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening.
    Yamada T; Saito M; Ishibashi T; Tsuboi M; Matsuhashi T; Sato A; Saito H; Takahashi S; Onuki K; Ouchi N
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 15648457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
    Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
    Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
    Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
    Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
    Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
    Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.