These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20137657)

  • 21. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increasing bending strength of tibial locking screws: mechanical tests and finite element analyses.
    Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16959388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compressive properties of trabecular bone in the distal femur.
    Burgers TA; Mason J; Niebur G; Ploeg HL
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1077-85. PubMed ID: 18206893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation.
    Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Wutte C; Augat P; Eberle S
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 21497354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model.
    Cao L; Youn I; Guilak F; Setton LA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 16995764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A B-spline based heterogeneous modeling and analysis of proximal femur with graded element.
    Pise UV; Bhatt AD; Srivastava RK; Warkedkar R
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 19541316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical strength repercussions of various fixative storage methods on bone.
    Wingerter S; Calvert G; Tucci M; Benghuzzi H; Russell G; Puckett A
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():290-5. PubMed ID: 16817623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants.
    Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of finite element analysis in dental ceramics research.
    Lang LA; Wang RF; Kang B; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):650-4. PubMed ID: 11753319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical properties of human articular disk and its influence on TMJ loading studied with the finite element method.
    Tanaka E; Sasaki A; Tahmina K; Yamaguchi K; Mori Y; Tanne K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 11394374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of rat bone under simulated microgravity using nanoindentation.
    Sun LW; Fan YB; Li DY; Zhao F; Xie T; Yang X; Gu ZT
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Nov; 5(9):3506-11. PubMed ID: 19450712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Micromechanical properties of human trabecular bone: a hierarchical investigation using nanoindentation.
    Norman J; Shapter JG; Short K; Smith LJ; Fazzalari NL
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Oct; 87(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 18085652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New approaches to cancellous bone bio-modeling.
    Avramescu ET; Călina ML; Rusu L; Neamţu MC; Enescu-Bieru D
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2009; 50(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 19434316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses.
    Magne P; Douglas WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11203619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new method to evaluate the elastic modulus of cortical bone by using a combined computed tomography and finite element approach.
    Huang HL; Tsai MT; Lin DJ; Chien CS; Hsu JT
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Apr; 40(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 20304390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling of dynamic fracture and damage in two-dimensional trabecular bone microstructures using the cohesive finite element method.
    Tomar V
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021021. PubMed ID: 18412508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Bohin F; Renault P; Barquins M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 12447223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.