155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20137838)
1. The Scottish Trial of Refer or Keep (the STORK study): midwives' intrapartum decision making.
Styles M; Cheyne H; O'Carroll R; Greig F; Dagge-Bell F; Niven C
Midwifery; 2011 Feb; 27(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 20137838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development of research tools used in the STORK Study (the Scottish Trial of Refer or Keep) to explore midwives' intrapartum decision making.
Styles M; Cheyne H; O'Carroll R; Greig F; Dagge-Bell F; Niven C
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 21237540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of maternity units' intrapartum intervention rates and midwives' risk perception for women suitable for midwifery-led care.
Mead MM; Kornbrot D
Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15020028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.
Offerhaus PM; Otten W; Boxem-Tiemessen JC; de Jonge A; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; Scheepers PL; Lagro-Janssen AL
Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):e69-78. PubMed ID: 25660846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Swedish midwives' rating of risks during labour progress and their attitudes toward performing intrapartum interventions: a web-based survey.
Wiklund I; Wallin J; Vikström M; Ransjö-Arvidson AB
Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):E456-60. PubMed ID: 21820774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in The Flanders, Belgium.
Mead M; Bogaerts A; Reyns M
Midwifery; 2007 Dec; 23(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 17126968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a midwife's continuous presence during childbirth a matter of course? Midwives' experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour.
Aune I; Amundsen HH; Skaget Aas LC
Midwifery; 2014 Jan; 30(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 23473911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midwives' experiences of facilitating normal birth in an obstetric-led unit: a feminist perspective.
Keating A; Fleming VE
Midwifery; 2009 Oct; 25(5):518-27. PubMed ID: 18222575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chinese midwives' views on a proposed midwife-led normal birth unit.
Cheung NF; Mander R; Wang X; Fu W; Zhu J
Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):744-55. PubMed ID: 18343000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth.
Cheyne H; Abhyankar P; McCourt C
Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1110-21. PubMed ID: 23968777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. English midwives' views and experiences of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in women at low obstetric risk: conflicts and compromises.
Hindley C; Hinsliff SW; Thomson AM
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(5):354-360. PubMed ID: 16945783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The buck stops here: midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland.
Harris FM; van Teijlingen E; Hundley V; Farmer J; Bryers H; Caldow J; Ireland J; Kiger A; Tucker J
Midwifery; 2011 Jun; 27(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 21247672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What factors influence midwives to provide obstetric high dependency care on the delivery suite or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit? Findings of a focus group study.
James A; Cooper S; Stenhouse E; Endacott R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Sep; 19(1):331. PubMed ID: 31500580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dutch women's decision-making in pregnancy and labour as seen through the eyes of their midwives.
van der Hulst LA; van Teijlingen ER; Bonsel GJ; Eskes M; Birnie E; Bleker OP
Midwifery; 2007 Sep; 23(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 17462797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Satisfaction and continuity of care: staff views of care in a midwife-managed delivery unit.
Hundley VA; Cruickshank FM; Milne JM; Glazener CM; Lang GD; Turner M; Blyth D; Mollison J
Midwifery; 1995 Dec; 11(4):163-73. PubMed ID: 8569517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwifery support in labour: how important is it to stay in the room?
Ross-Davie M; McElligott M; King K; Little M
Pract Midwife; 2014 Jun; 17(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 25004699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' experiences of caring for women with female genital mutilation: Insights and ways forward for practice in Australia.
Dawson AJ; Turkmani S; Varol N; Nanayakkara S; Sullivan E; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2015 Sep; 28(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 25686876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of exploratory factor analysis in evaluating midwives' attitudes and stereotypical myths related to the identification and management of domestic violence in practice.
Lazenbatt A; Thompson-Cree ME; McMurray F
Midwifery; 2005 Dec; 21(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 16076514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
