222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20137883)
1. Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion.
Scaranelo AM; Crystal P; Bukhanov K; Helbich TH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Jun; 61(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 20137883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.
Scaranelo AM; Eiada R; Bukhanov K; Crystal P
Br J Radiol; 2012 May; 85(1013):517-22. PubMed ID: 22556404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results.
Baum F; Fischer U; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):3015-7. PubMed ID: 12439584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.
Murakami R; Kumita S; Tani H; Yoshida T; Sugizaki K; Kuwako T; Kiriyama T; Hakozaki K; Okazaki E; Yanagihara K; Iida S; Haga S; Tsuchiya S
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density.
Wienbeck S; Andrijevska V; Kück F; Perske C; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Fischer U; Lotz J; Kunze M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(22):e33900. PubMed ID: 37266644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Vosshenrich R; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2002 Nov; 12(11):2679-83. PubMed ID: 12386757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
