These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20138430)

  • 21. The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy.
    Jääskeläinen SK
    J Orofac Pain; 2004; 18(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 15636020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quantitative Sensory Testing in the facial area: a review].
    Eberhard L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(4-5):291-6. PubMed ID: 23916267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a Standardized Clinical Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery to Judge the Clinical Relevance of Sensory Differences Between Adjacent Body Areas.
    Dimova V; Oertel BG; Lötsch J
    Clin J Pain; 2017 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27300723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative somatosensory testing of the abdomen: establishing initial reference values across developmental age and biological sex.
    Sieberg CB; Lunde CE; Shafrir AL; Meints SM; Madraswalla M; Huntley D; Olsen H; Wong C; DiVasta AD; Missmer SA; Sethna N
    Pain; 2024 Jan; 165(1):115-125. PubMed ID: 37530649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility of quantitative sensory testing in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
    Mensink MO; Eijkelkamp N; Veldhuijzen DS; Wulffraat NM
    Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2022 Aug; 20(1):63. PubMed ID: 35945540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in Somatosensory Function Related to Hand Dominance: Results of a Quantitative Sensory Testing Study in Healthy Volunteers.
    Kennedy DL; Pateman I; Rice ASC; Alexander CM
    J Pain Res; 2024; 17():2917-2928. PubMed ID: 39253737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST).
    Pigg M; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P; Drangsholt M; List T
    Pain; 2010 Feb; 148(2):220-226. PubMed ID: 20022428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative sensory testing of neuropathic pain patients: potential mechanistic and therapeutic implications.
    Pfau DB; Geber C; Birklein F; Treede RD
    Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2012 Jun; 16(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 22535540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Data of the quantitative orofacial somatosensory functions of healthy subjects and its influence factors analysis].
    Yang GJ; Cao Y; Zhang L; Qin XY; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):521-528. PubMed ID: 26080887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical and electrophysiologic correlates of quantitative sensory testing in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.
    Hayes KC; Wolfe DL; Hsieh JT; Potter PJ; Krassioukov A; Durham CE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1612-9. PubMed ID: 12422334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of conditioned pain modulation on trigeminal somatosensory function evaluated by quantitative sensory testing.
    Oono Y; Baad-Hansen L; Wang K; Arendt-Nielsen L; Svensson P
    Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2684-2690. PubMed ID: 23911699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Procedure for certification of QST laboratories].
    Geber C; Scherens A; Pfau D; Nestler N; Zenz M; Tölle T; Baron R; Treede RD; Maier C
    Schmerz; 2009 Feb; 23(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 19184121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative sensory tests before and 1(1/2) years after orthognathic surgery: a cross-sectional study.
    Baad-Hansen L; Arima T; Arendt-Nielsen L; Neumann-Jensen B; Svensson P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 20113390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Association between quantitative sensory testing and pain or disability in paediatric chronic pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoth DE; Blankenburg M; Wager J; Broadbent P; Zhang J; Zernikow B; Liossi C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031861. PubMed ID: 31594898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of trigeminal nerve functions by quantitative sensory testing in patients and healthy volunteers.
    Yekta SS; Smeets R; Stein JM; Ellrich J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2437-51. PubMed ID: 20598414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) in Drug-Naïve Patients with Parkinson's Disease.
    Fründt O; Grashorn W; Buhmann C; Forkmann K; Mainka T; Bingel U; Schmidt K
    J Parkinsons Dis; 2019; 9(2):369-378. PubMed ID: 30829618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.
    Baad-Hansen L; Pigg M; Yang G; List T; Svensson P; Drangsholt M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 42(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 25284726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Somatosensory abnormalities in Chinese patients with painful temporomandibular disorders.
    Yang G; Baad-Hansen L; Wang K; Fu K; Xie QF; Svensson P
    J Headache Pain; 2016; 17():31. PubMed ID: 27071957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Alterations in endogenous pain modulation in endurance athletes: an experimental study using quantitative sensory testing and the cold-pressor task.
    Tesarz J; Gerhardt A; Schommer K; Treede RD; Eich W
    Pain; 2013 Jul; 154(7):1022-9. PubMed ID: 23657118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pseudoradicular and radicular low-back pain--a disease continuum rather than different entities? Answers from quantitative sensory testing.
    Freynhagen R; Rolke R; Baron R; Tölle TR; Rutjes AK; Schu S; Treede RD
    Pain; 2008 Mar; 135(1-2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.