These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20139445)

  • 41. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach.
    Grimm S; Schröger E; Bendixen A; Bäss P; Roye A; Deouell LY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):934-47. PubMed ID: 18289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Boll S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Immediate integration of prosodic information from speech and visual information from pictures in the absence of focused attention: a mismatch negativity study.
    Li X; Yang Y; Ren G
    Neuroscience; 2009 Jun; 161(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19409214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):620-31. PubMed ID: 19304651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A cross-modal weapon focus effect: The influence of a weapon's presence on memory for auditory information.
    Pickel KL; French TA; Betts JM
    Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):277-92. PubMed ID: 12908676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.
    Parmentier FBR; Pacheco-Unguetti AP; Valero S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190644. PubMed ID: 29300763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness.
    Backer KC; Alain C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1554-66. PubMed ID: 22506788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Matching voice and face identity from static images.
    Mavica LW; Barenholtz E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23276114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 22022895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change.
    Parmentier FB; Elsley JV; Andrés P; Barceló F
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 21382615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory search using vowel sounds.
    Charleston DE; Boyer RW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1289-90. PubMed ID: 2399101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.
    Hughes RW; Hurlstone MJ; Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 22731996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Serial memory for sound-specified locations: effects of spatial uncertainty and motor suppression.
    Groeger JA; Banks AP; Simpson PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 17853218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
    Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.