These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20139448)

  • 1. The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial.
    Lunau R; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 20139448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Hilkenmeier F; Scharlau I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 21258909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target sparing effects in the attentional blink depend on type of stimulus.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2104-23. PubMed ID: 21751050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "beam of darkness": spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects.
    Conci M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1725-38. PubMed ID: 19933558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is all sparing created equal? Comparing lag-1 sparing and extended sparing in temporal object perception.
    Visser TA; Ohan JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1527-41. PubMed ID: 21553987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the role of intervening distractors in the attentional blink.
    Brisson B; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21258908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of temporal order is impaired during the time course of the attentional blink.
    Spalek TM; Lagroix HE; Yanko MR; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):402-13. PubMed ID: 21928925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2489-501. PubMed ID: 21901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials.
    Craston P; Wyble B; Chennu S; Bowman H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):550-66. PubMed ID: 18564042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction and the auditory attentional blink.
    Horváth J; Burgyán A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 21264693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A re-examination of the impact of object processing on shifts of spatial attention.
    Visser TA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 21264707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrency benefits in the attentional blink: attentional flexibility and shifts of decision criteria.
    Lapointe-Goupil R; Fortin C; Brisson B; Tremblay S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):374-88. PubMed ID: 21264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the costs of lag-1 sparing.
    Dux PE; Wyble B; Jolicœur P; Dell'Acqua R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):416-28. PubMed ID: 23937218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An attentional blink for nontargets?
    Meng M; Potter MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 21264713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical mechanisms of attention in time: neural correlates of the Lag-1-sparing phenomenon.
    Kessler K; Schmitz F; Gross J; Hommel B; Shapiro K; Schnitzler A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 May; 21(9):2563-74. PubMed ID: 15932614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously?
    Ghorashi S; Spalek TM; Enns JT; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19633339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.