302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20139463)
1. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
Francis AL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
Caparos S; Linnell KJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise.
Rönnberg J; Rudner M; Lunner T; Zekveld AA
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):263-9. PubMed ID: 20871181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2985-95. PubMed ID: 12509020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task.
Shafiro V; Gygi B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 18247646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory.
Parmentier FB; Maybery MT; Elsley J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20139445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
Kim JI; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults.
LaPointe LL; Heald GR; Stierwalt JA; Kemker BE; Maurice T
J Atten Disord; 2007 May; 10(4):398-409. PubMed ID: 17449839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
Shimomura T; Kumada T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1694-709. PubMed ID: 21671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
