These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20139558)

  • 21. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations to dentin in vivo and in vitro.
    Hahn P; Weyen G; Fischer P; Plogmann S; Hannig M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 19146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of the composite photoactivation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness.
    F e Silva AL; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Sartini Paulillo LA
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 16098575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro secondary caries inhibition by adhesive systems in enamel around composite restorations.
    Pinto CF; Paes-Leme AF; Ambrosano GM; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 20533636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite.
    Koike T; Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Yukitani W; Yamashita T; Wakumoto S; Hisamitsu H
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12469752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion for two different adhesive systems to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin.
    Hosoya Y; Shinkawa H; Marshall GW
    J Dent; 2005 Apr; 33(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 15781136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
    Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of different tests used to measure the bond strength to dentin of two adhesive systems.
    Cavalcante LM; Erhardt MC; Bedran-de-Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Ambrosano GM
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 16555656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.