These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20139569)
1. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study. Vijayalakshmi RD; Nagachandran KS; Kummi P; Jayakumar P Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys. Krishnan V; Kumar KJ Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 15673147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Verstrynge A; Van Humbeeck J; Willems G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 17045145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations. Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Surface Characteristics of Stainless Steel, TMA, Timolium, and Titanium-niobium Wires: An in vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Babu KP; Keerthi VN; Madathody D; Prasanna AL; Gopinath V; Kumar MS; Kumar AN J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 27443362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study. Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Force-deflection properties of initial orthodontic archwires. Quintão CC; Cal-Neto JP; Menezes LM; Elias CN World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19388430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elastic flexural properties of multistranded stainless steel versus conventional nickel titanium archwires. Rucker BK; Kusy RP Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 12169029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets. Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative stiffness of beta titanium archwires. Johnson E Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 12828434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys. Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state. Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elastic properties of alternative versus single-stranded leveling archwires. Rucker BK; Kusy RP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):528-41. PubMed ID: 12439482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical characteristics of various tempers of as-received cobalt-chromium archwires. Kusy RP; Mims L; Whitley JQ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):274-91. PubMed ID: 11244422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tribological behaviour of orthodontic archwires under dry and wet sliding conditions in-vitro. II--Wear patterns. Berradja A; Willems G; Celis JP Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16792242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Whitley JQ; Kusy RP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tribological behaviour of orthodontic archwires under dry and wet sliding conditions in-vitro. I--Frictional behaviour. Berradja A; Willems G; Celis JP Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 16792241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of surface treatment and clinical use on friction in NiTi orthodontic wires. Wichelhaus A; Geserick M; Hibst R; Sander FG Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):938-45. PubMed ID: 15923033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]