BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20140257)

  • 1. Effects of caller characteristics on auditory laterality in an early primate (Microcebus murinus).
    Leliveld LM; Scheumann M; Zimmermann E
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9031. PubMed ID: 20140257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex-specific asymmetries in communication sound perception are not related to hand preference in an early primate.
    Scheumann M; Zimmermann E
    BMC Biol; 2008 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 18199316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of sound specificity and familiarity on Japanese macaques' (Macaca fuscata) auditory laterality.
    Lemasson A; Koda H; Kato A; Oyakawa C; Blois-Heulin C; Masataka N
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 208(1):286-9. PubMed ID: 20006649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are temporal features crucial acoustic cues in dog vocal recognition?
    Siniscalchi M; Lusito R; Sasso R; Quaranta A
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 22544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory lateralization of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in cats.
    Siniscalchi M; Laddago S; Quaranta A
    Laterality; 2016; 21(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 26618245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vervet monkeys and humans show brain asymmetries for processing conspecific vocalizations, but with opposite patterns of laterality.
    Gil-da-Costa R; Hauser MD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1599):2313-8. PubMed ID: 16928633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric specialization in dogs for processing different acoustic stimuli.
    Siniscalchi M; Quaranta A; Rogers LJ
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3349. PubMed ID: 18843371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right ear advantage for conspecific calls in adults and subadults, but not infants, California sea lions (Zalophus californianus): hemispheric specialization for communication?
    Böye M; Güntürkün O; Vauclair J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 21(6):1727-32. PubMed ID: 15845100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-specific calls signal infants' needs in a strepsirrhine primate, the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus).
    Scheumann M; Zimmermann E; Deichsel G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2007 Nov; 49(7):708-18. PubMed ID: 17943980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.).
    Braune P; Schmidt S; Zimmermann E
    BMC Biol; 2008 May; 6():19. PubMed ID: 18462484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The head turn paradigm to assess auditory laterality in cats: influence of ear position and repeated sound presentation.
    Konerding WS; Zimmermann E; Bleich E; Hedrich HJ; Scheumann M
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3925. PubMed ID: 29085747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus).
    Basile M; Boivin S; Boutin A; Blois-Heulin C; Hausberger M; Lemasson A
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jul; 12(4):611-9. PubMed ID: 19283416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High frequency/ultrasonic communication in a critically endangered nocturnal primate, Claire's mouse lemur (Microcebus mamiratra).
    Hasiniaina AF; Scheumann M; Rina Evasoa M; Braud D; Rasoloharijaona S; Randrianambinina B; Zimmermann E
    Am J Primatol; 2018 Jun; 80(6):e22866. PubMed ID: 29722032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of temporal cues in rhesus monkey vocal recognition: orienting asymmetries to reversed calls.
    Ghazanfar AA; Smith-Rohrberg D; Hauser MD
    Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 11910173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social and emotional values of sounds influence human (Homo sapiens) and non-human primate (Cercopithecus campbelli) auditory laterality.
    Basile M; Lemasson A; Blois-Heulin C
    PLoS One; 2009 Jul; 4(7):e6295. PubMed ID: 19609434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.
    Fang G; Xue F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():77-84. PubMed ID: 24613236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric Specialization for Processing the Communicative and Emotional Content of Vocal Communication in a Social Mammal, the Domestic Pig.
    Leliveld LMC; Düpjan S; Tuchscherer A; Puppe B
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2020; 14():596758. PubMed ID: 33328923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interhemispheric differences in auditory processing revealed by fMRI in awake rhesus monkeys.
    Joly O; Ramus F; Pressnitzer D; Vanduffel W; Orban GA
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Apr; 22(4):838-53. PubMed ID: 21709178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory perception vs. recognition: representation of complex communication sounds in the mouse auditory cortical fields.
    Geissler DB; Ehret G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Feb; 19(4):1027-40. PubMed ID: 15009150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.