These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20140504)

  • 21. Capacity planning for waste management systems: an interval fuzzy robust dynamic programming approach.
    Nie X; Huang GH; Li Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Nov; 59(11):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19947113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planning of municipal solid waste management under dual uncertainties.
    Zhang X; Huang GH; Nie X; Chen Y; Lin Q
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):673-84. PubMed ID: 19854816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fuzzy AHP approach for prioritizing electronic waste management options: a case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Khoshand A; Rahimi K; Ehteshami M; Gharaei S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):9649-9660. PubMed ID: 30729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches.
    Abbasi M; El Hanandeh A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():13-22. PubMed ID: 27297046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Design and development of a fuzzy credibility-based reverse logistics network with buyback offers: A case study.
    Amirdadi M; Dehghanian F; Nahofti Kohneh J
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Jul; 40(7):1069-1084. PubMed ID: 34617470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
    Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing an integrated municipal solid waste management system using a fuzzy chance-constrained programming model considering economic and environmental aspects under uncertainty.
    Bavaghar Zaeimi M; Abbas Rassafi A
    Waste Manag; 2021 Apr; 125():268-279. PubMed ID: 33714934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making.
    Akter T; Simonovic SP
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16046249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Stochastic Multi-Attribute Method for Measuring Sustainability Performance of a Supplier Based on a Triple Bottom Line Approach in a Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment.
    Qu G; Xue R; Li T; Qu W; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32210146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of a geographic information system-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model to locate potential municipal solid waste incineration plant sites: A case study of Izmir Metropolitan Municipality.
    Yalcinkaya S; Kirtiloglu OS
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Jan; 39(1):174-184. PubMed ID: 32662341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis.
    Ghinea C; Drăgoi EN; Comăniţă ED; Gavrilescu M; Câmpean T; Curteanu S; Gavrilescu M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 182():80-93. PubMed ID: 27454099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An assessment of cause and effect decision-making model for firm environmental knowledge management capacities in uncertainty.
    Tseng ML
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Feb; 161(1-4):549-64. PubMed ID: 19242814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A facility location model for municipal solid waste management system under uncertain environment.
    Yadav V; Bhurjee AK; Karmakar S; Dikshit AK
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():760-771. PubMed ID: 28395953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management.
    Adriaenssens V; De Baets B; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Feb; 319(1-3):1-12. PubMed ID: 14967497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FSILP: fuzzy-stochastic-interval linear programming for supporting municipal solid waste management.
    Li P; Chen B
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1198-209. PubMed ID: 21232844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Waste management with recourse: an inexact dynamic programming model containing fuzzy boundary intervals in objectives and constraints.
    Tan Q; Huang GH; Cai YP
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1898-913. PubMed ID: 20580864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applying multi-criteria decision-making to improve the waste reduction policy in Taiwan.
    Su JP; Hung ML; Chao CW; Ma HW
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jan; 28(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19710114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.