These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20140880)

  • 1. An MSE-reduced estimator for the response proportion in a two-stage clinical trial.
    Li Q
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 20140880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and efficient bias-reduced estimator of response probability following a group sequential phase II trial.
    Guo HY; Liu A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 16078384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Balanced two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
    Ye F; Shyr Y
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 17942467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval estimation of binomial proportion in clinical trials with a two-stage design.
    Tsai WY; Chi Y; Chen CM
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 17566141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new adaptive design based on Simon's two-stage optimal design for phase II clinical trials.
    Jin H; Wei Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Nov; 33(6):1255-60. PubMed ID: 22772088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials.
    Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimax and admissible adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():90. PubMed ID: 27485595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastically curtailed phase II clinical trials.
    Ayanlowo AO; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1462-72. PubMed ID: 16900560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative designs of phase II trials considering response and toxicity.
    Jin H
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 17428744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Lee T; Kim K; George SL
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 14755389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
    Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.
    Banerjee A; Tsiatis AA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3382-95. PubMed ID: 16479547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating surrogate markers of clinical outcome when measured with error.
    Dafni UG; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1445-62. PubMed ID: 9883544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.