These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20141319)

  • 1. Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.
    Stahlman WD; Roberts S; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 20141319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.
    Ishii T; Sakagami T
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation of bar-press duration: where do new responses come from?
    Roberts S; Gharib A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 16621334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pigeons make errors as a result of interval timing in a visual, but not a visual-spatial, midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23066981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual determinants of temporal control: Behavioral contrast in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16364564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of variation by reward probability.
    Gharib A; Gade C; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Oct; 30(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 15506853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resurgence of time allocation.
    Cançado CRX; Lattal KA; Carpenter HK; Solley EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):398-413. PubMed ID: 29105098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response variability in pigeons in a Pavlovian task.
    Stahlman WD; Young ME; Blaisdell AP
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 20400731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sources of variability and systematic error in mouse timing behavior.
    Gallistel CR; King A; McDonald R
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 14709111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.
    Kaiser DH; Zentall TR; Neiman E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12395499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing and the control of variation.
    Gharib A; Derby S; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Apr; 27(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 11296491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What-where-when memory in pigeons.
    Skov-Rackette SI; Miller NY; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):345-58. PubMed ID: 17044738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of unsignaled delays of reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.
    Elcoro M; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21801816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical counting.
    Fetterman JG; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2010 Sep; 85(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 20540994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do rats time filled and empty intervals of equal duration differently?
    Macinnis ML
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 17343993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing behavior in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
    Orduña V; Hong E; Bouzas A
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 224(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 21683739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anticipatory cues can interfere with inhibitory operant behavior in the rat.
    Persinger MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):304-6. PubMed ID: 9760661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.