These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20141691)

  • 1. Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.
    Murtaza B; Ali Khan N; Sharif MA; Malik IB; Mahmood A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20141691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
    Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients.
    Sivam NS; Suresh S; Hadke MS; Kate V; Ananthakrishnan N
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1995; 16(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 8854960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
    Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevention of abdominal wound disruption utilizing the Smead-Jones closure technique.
    Wallace D; Hernandez W; Schlaerth JB; Nalick RN; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 6994003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency and risk factors for wound dehiscence/burst abdomen in midline laparotomies.
    Waqar SH; Malik ZI; Razzaq A; Abdullah MT; Shaima A; Zahid MA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2005; 17(4):70-3. PubMed ID: 16599042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforced tension line suture closure after midline laparotomy in emergency surgery.
    Agarwal A; Hossain Z; Agarwal A; Das A; Chakraborty S; Mitra N; Gupta M; Ray U
    Trop Doct; 2011 Oct; 41(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 21831931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study.
    Israelsson LA; Jonsson T
    Eur J Surg; 1996 Feb; 162(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8639725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous double loop closure for midline laparotomy wounds.
    Nasir GA; Baker KK
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 11331495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mass closure of the abdominal wound with delayed absorbable suture in surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Hoffman MS; Villa A; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; LaPolla JP; Barton DP; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 2061883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.
    Gislason H; Viste A
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Oct; 165(10):958-61. PubMed ID: 10574104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized evaluation of midline fascial closure in gastric bariatric operations.
    Brolin RE
    Am J Surg; 1996 Oct; 172(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 8873523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abdominal wound closure using a nonabsorbable single-layer technique.
    Shepherd JH; Cavanagh D; Riggs D; Praphat H; Wisniewski BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Feb; 61(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 6337356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Technique of dynamic support suture and palisade closure].
    Ermisch J; Schauer K
    Chirurg; 1992 Aug; 63(8):662-5. PubMed ID: 1395863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence of incisional hernia following emergency abdominal surgery.
    Mingoli A; Puggioni A; Sgarzini G; Luciani G; Corzani F; Ciccarone F; Baldassarre E; Modini C
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999; 31(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 10575560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Bucknall TE; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antibacterial [corrected] coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection.
    Justinger C; Moussavian MR; Schlueter C; Kopp B; Kollmar O; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 19231586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies].
    Bresler L; Courbey PJ; Feldman L; Bilweiss J; Tortuyaux JM; Rauch P; Boissel P; Grosdidier J
    Ann Chir; 1995; 49(6):544-8. PubMed ID: 8526449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.
    El Charif MH; Hassan Z; Hoballah J; Khalife M; Sbaity E
    Trials; 2020 Jul; 21(1):608. PubMed ID: 32616017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.