176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20142173)
1. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of in-stent tissue coverage after stent implantation.
Capodanno D; Prati F; Pawlowsky T; Cera M; La Manna A; Albertucci M; Tamburino C
EuroIntervention; 2009 Nov; 5(5):538-43. PubMed ID: 20142173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT.
Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Serruys PW; Girasis C; Garg S; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; García-García H; van Es GA; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 21359517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation.
Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing coronary interventions for stent thrombosis.
Alfonso F; Dutary J; Paulo M; Gonzalo N; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Escaned J; Bañuelos C; Hernández R; Macaya C
Heart; 2012 Aug; 98(16):1213-20. PubMed ID: 22826559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Liu Y; Shimamura K; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Shiono Y; Orii M; Yamano T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 30(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 24272334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement and reproducibility of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for the analysis of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
Gómez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Diletti R; Gogas BD; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Gobbens P; Van Es GA; García-García HM; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 May; 79(6):890-902. PubMed ID: 21523891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical coherence tomography assessment of in vivo vascular response after implantation of overlapping bare-metal and drug-eluting stents.
Guagliumi G; Musumeci G; Sirbu V; Bezerra HG; Suzuki N; Fiocca L; Matiashvili A; Lortkipanidze N; Trivisonno A; Valsecchi O; Biondi-Zoccai G; Costa MA;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 May; 3(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 20488410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation in 3 months duration of neointimal coverage after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation by optical coherence tomography: the ENDEAVOR OCT trial.
Kim JS; Jang IK; Fan C; Kim TH; Kim JS; Park SM; Choi EY; Lee SH; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1240-7. PubMed ID: 20129551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strut coverage and vessel wall response to zotarolimus-eluting and bare-metal stents implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OCTAMI (Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study.
Guagliumi G; Sirbu V; Bezerra H; Biondi-Zoccai G; Fiocca L; Musumeci G; Matiashvili A; Lortkipanidze N; Tahara S; Valsecchi O; Costa M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jun; 3(6):680-7. PubMed ID: 20630463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Old" problems revisited; imaging the coronary in high resolution.
Bezerra HG; Tahara S; Parikh SA; Costa MA
EuroIntervention; 2009 Nov; 5(5):523-5. PubMed ID: 20142169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
