These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 201427)
41. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to silver and colophonium in a jeweler. Agarwal S; Gawkrodger DJ Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):74. PubMed ID: 12022124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Latent (subclinical) contact dermatitis evolving into occupational allergic contact dermatitis from extremely small amounts of epoxy resin. Kanerva L; Jolanki R; Estlander T; Alanko K Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jul; 43(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 10902594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Occupational dermatitis in a bee-keeper. Melli MC; Giorgini S; Sertoli A Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Sep; 9(5):427-8. PubMed ID: 6226485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Occupational dermatoses in workers exposed to resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Bruze M; Almgren G Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Oct; 19(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 2975578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Toxic skin damages caused by dyeing of synthetic fibers]. Reinhard M; Tronnier H Berufsdermatosen; 1970 Aug; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 4256791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Occupationally-induced allergic and photoallergic reactions to epoxide resins in railroad employees]. Bachurzewska B; Borucka I; Ogonowski E Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 2971520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Occupational eczema due to ethylenediamine in the synthetic fiber manufacturing industry]. Wüthrich B Berufsdermatosen; 1972; 20(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 4262763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Accidental diagnosis of aluminium sensitivity with Finn Chambers. Tosti A; Vincenzi C; Peluso AM Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 2144810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The use of laboratory methods in contact dermatitis induced by composite materials. Ayala F; Lembo G; Balato N; Patruno C; Scognamiglio G; Strazzullo G; de Stefano S Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 2143442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Occupational dermatitis in a silk-screen maker. Goossens A; Coninx D; Rommens K; Verhamme B Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Jul; 39(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 9686987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [A new cause of contact dermatitis: propolis]. Monti M; Berti E; Carminati G; Cusini M G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 1982; 117(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 6227550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Occupational contact dermatitis with rhinoconjunctivitis due to Tilia cordata and colophonium exposure in a cosmetician. Krakowiak A; Krêcisz B; Pas-Wyroślak A; Dudek W; Kieć-Swierzyñska M; Pałczyñski C Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):34. PubMed ID: 15291831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Contact allergy to ethoxylated phenol. Ashworth J; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Feb; 24(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 1828212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [On the significance of epicutaneous colophony tests]. Hering H Dermatol Wochenschr; 1965 Jul; 151(29):804-7. PubMed ID: 4221088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Allergy to colophony. Ducombs G Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Apr; 4(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 149634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]