BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20142797)

  • 1. Torque measurements of the ossicular chain: implication on the MRI safety of the hearing implant Vibrant Soundbridge.
    Jesacher MO; Kiefer J; Zierhofer C; Fauser C
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 20142797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.
    Wagner JH; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 21844783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge interposed between the stapes and tympanic membrane after incus necrosis.
    Cremers CW; Verhaegen VJ; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 18957899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head.
    Chen T; Ren LJ; Yin DM; Li J; Yang L; Dai PD; Zhang TY
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():97-103. PubMed ID: 28666703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process.
    Schraven SP; Dalhoff E; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Mlynski R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24192762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
    Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coupling of an active middle-ear implant to the long process of the incus using an elastic clip attachment.
    Schraven SP; Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Rak K; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():179-184. PubMed ID: 27037037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques to improve the efficiency of a middle ear implant: effect of different methods of coupling to the ossicular chain.
    Devèze A; Koka K; Tringali S; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 23196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vibrant soundbridge surgery: evaluation of transcanal surgical approaches.
    Truy E; Eshraghi AA; Balkany TJ; Telishi FF; Van De Water TR; Lavieille JP
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):887-95. PubMed ID: 16936574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ["Vibrant Soundbridge" middle ear implant for auditory rehabilitation in sensory hearing loss. I. Clinical aspects, indications and initial results].
    Dazert S; Shehata-Dieler WE; Dieler R; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Aug; 79(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 11006909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
    Foyt D; Carfrae M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.
    Skarżyński H; Plichta Ł; Król B; Cywka KB; Skarżyński PH
    Am J Case Rep; 2021 May; 22():e929933. PubMed ID: 33976104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How middle-ear implants work].
    Cenjor Español C; Morera Pérez C; Ramos Macías A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Nov; 59 Suppl 1():7-9. PubMed ID: 19094892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of the coupling between ossicular chain and mass loading for evaluation of implantable hearing device.
    Wang X; Hu Y; Wang Z; Shi H
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):48-57. PubMed ID: 21554941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative auditory steady state response measurements during Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation in patients with mixed hearing loss: preliminary results.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Noten JF; Luijten BM; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1365-8. PubMed ID: 20729778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between incus short process and long process coupling of the vibrant soundbridge in human temporal bones.
    Graf L; Lochner J; Mojallal H; Arnold A; Honegger F; Stieger C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 35174741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Vibrant Soundbridge
    Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Péan V; Van de Heyning P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):314-323. PubMed ID: 28784040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of mass loading the ossicles with a floating mass transducer on middle ear transfer function.
    Needham AJ; Jiang D; Bibas A; Jeronimidis G; O'Connor AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 15793408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.