These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2014301)

  • 1. Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers.
    Kagetsu NJ; Litt AW
    Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 2014301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):811-4. PubMed ID: 3048071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative determination of magnetic force on a coronary stent in MRI.
    Lopič N; Jelen A; Vrtnik S; Jagličić Z; Wencka M; Starc R; Blinc A; Dolinšek J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 23125054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants.
    Davis PL; Crooks L; Arakawa M; McRee R; Kaufman L; Margulis AR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Oct; 137(4):857-60. PubMed ID: 6974985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of magnetism-related forces and torque moments affecting medical instruments, implants, and foreign objects during magnetic resonance imaging at all degrees of freedom.
    Planert J; Modler H; Vosshenrich R
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 8798170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses.
    Voigt A; Christ S; Klein M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):664-8. PubMed ID: 18440779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli S; Kanal E
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 8210394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.
    Heller JW; Brackmann DE; Tucci DL; Nyenhuis JA; Chou CK
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 8892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.
    Chopra V; Smith BJ; Preiskel HW; Palmer RM; Curtis R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of magnetic resonance imagers on implanted neurostimulators.
    Gleason CA; Kaula NF; Hricak H; Schmidt RA; Tanagho EA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jan; 15(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 1371004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A portable Halbach magnet that can be opened and closed without force: the NMR-CUFF.
    Windt CW; Soltner H; van Dusschoten D; Blümler P
    J Magn Reson; 2011 Jan; 208(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21036637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aneurysm clip testing for ferromagnetic properties: clip variability issues.
    Kanal E; Shellock FG; Lewin JS
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):576-8. PubMed ID: 8685361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.
    Devge C; Tjellström A; Nellström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9197100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention force of magnets in endosteal implants used for facial prosthesis.
    Nestle B; Lukas D; Schwenzer N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 28(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10065648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Interactions of external magnetic fields and metallic middle ear implants].
    Schadel A; Kremer R
    HNO; 1989 Aug; 37(8):315-9. PubMed ID: 2793529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.