These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2014301)

  • 21. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review.
    Shellock FG; Curtis JS
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 2068325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Injuries associated with MR imaging: survey of safety records and methods used to screen patients for metallic foreign bodies before imaging.
    Boutin RD; Briggs JE; Williamson MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 8273663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of sterilization on the retention properties of magnetic attachments for dental implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems.
    Chakeres DW; de Vocht F
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15556664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on implantable permanent magnets.
    Schneider ML; Walker GB; Dormer KJ
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):687-9. PubMed ID: 8588678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves.
    Soulen RL; Budinger TF; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):705-7. PubMed ID: 3969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 61(6):1887-93. PubMed ID: 24845299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [In-vitro-study and patient examinations with MRT: the significance of metal implants].
    Grebmeier J; Weikl A; Glückert K; Hofmann-Preiss K; Huk WJ; Roedl W; Wolf F
    Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 1852036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength.
    Guermazi A; Miaux Y; Zaim S; Peterfy CG; White D; Genant HK
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Apr; 58(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 12662956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Orthodontic brackets in high field MR imaging: experimental evaluation of magnetic field interactions at 3.0 Tesla].
    Kemper J; Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1691-8. PubMed ID: 16333793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gradient-induced longitudinal relaxation of hyperpolarized noble gases in the fringe fields of superconducting magnets used for magnetic resonance.
    Zheng W; Cleveland ZI; Möller HE; Driehuys B
    J Magn Reson; 2011 Feb; 208(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 21134771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants.
    Laakman RW; Kaufman B; Han JS; Nelson AD; Clampitt M; O'Block AM; Haaga JR; Alfidi RJ
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):711-4. PubMed ID: 4059558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Nov; 16(5):485-96. PubMed ID: 12412025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ferromagnetic materials in patients: detection before MR imaging.
    Finn EJ; Di Chiro G; Brooks RA; Sato S
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 4001400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hazards of magnetic resonance imaging.
    DeLuca SA; Castronovo FP
    Am Fam Physician; 1990 Jan; 41(1):145-6. PubMed ID: 2294670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure for pectus excavatum: I. Development, design, and simulations for feasibility and safety.
    Harrison MR; Estefan-Ventura D; Fechter R; Moran AM; Christensen D
    J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Jan; 42(1):81-5; discussion 85-6. PubMed ID: 17208545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A uniplanar three-axis gradient set for in vivo magnetic resonance microscopy.
    Demyanenko AV; Zhao L; Kee Y; Nie S; Fraser SE; Tyszka JM
    J Magn Reson; 2009 Sep; 200(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19539503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.