These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20143242)

  • 1. Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology.
    Ender A; Mörmann WH; Mehl A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 20143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology.
    Kollmuss M; Jakob FM; Kirchner HG; Ilie N; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):851-7. PubMed ID: 22580927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics.
    Kollmuss M; Kist S; Goeke JE; Hickel R; Huth KC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 26245275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians' design.
    Litzenburger AP; Hickel R; Richter MJ; Mehl AC; Probst FA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):491-6. PubMed ID: 22451342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of occlusal contact errors of 6 chairside CAD/CAM crowns: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Pan Y; Lin H; Wang Y; Jiang L; Cheng Y; Yu H; Cheng H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 36333533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM posterior ceramic crowns after manual enhancement of occlusal morphology.
    Passos L; Torrealba Y; Linke B; Street A; Passos S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 30264048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The effect of tooth preparation design on the CAD/CAM all-ceramic coping crown's fitness].
    Zhao YF; Wang HR; Li Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 38(5):330-2. PubMed ID: 14680576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canine guidance via Biogeneric Copy: a clinical report.
    Kunkel TC; Engelmeier RL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 27027104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of tooth preparations for zirconia-based crowns and fixed dental prostheses using stereolithography data sets.
    Winkelmeyer C; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 27236595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of occlusal contacts for crowns with chairside CAD/CAM techniques.
    Fasbinder DJ; Poticny DJ
    Int J Comput Dent; 2010; 13(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 21323011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided evaluation of preparations for CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Güth JF; Wallbach J; Stimmelmayr M; Gernet W; Beuer F; Edelhoff D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1389-95. PubMed ID: 22868825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems.
    Lee KB; Park CW; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Dent Mater J; 2008 May; 27(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 18717171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.