These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20143304)

  • 1. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment.
    Bech M; Kjaer T; Lauridsen J
    Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20143304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
    Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete-choice contingent valuation.
    Yeung RY; Smith RD; Ho LM; Johnston JM; Leung GM
    Health Econ; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1077-89. PubMed ID: 16518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using willingness to pay to measure family members' preferences in mental health.
    Mulvaney-Day NE
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Jun; 8(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 15998979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison.
    Determann D; Lambooij MS; Steyerberg EW; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):953-960. PubMed ID: 28712625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes.
    Bijlenga D; Bonsel GJ; Birnie E
    Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1392-406. PubMed ID: 20967891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Patient preferences and willingness to wait for a work-related orthopaedic rehabilitation: a discrete choice experiment].
    Bethge M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Mar; 71(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19288431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convergent validity between a discrete choice experiment and a direct, open-ended method: comparison of preferred attribute levels and willingness to pay estimates.
    Marjon van der Pol ; Shiell A; Au F; Johnston D; Tough S
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 67(12):2043-50. PubMed ID: 18952337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Donaldson C
    J Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 23(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 15019754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
    Guimarães C; Marra CA; Colley L; Gill S; Simpson S; Meneilly G; Queiroz RH; Lynd LD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):567-73. PubMed ID: 19764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Willingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment.
    Grutters JP; Kessels AG; Dirksen CD; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Anteunis LJ; Joore MA
    Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1110-9. PubMed ID: 18489505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Rose JM; Bliemer MC
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Howard K; Salkeld G
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents.
    Neumann PJ; Cohen JT; Hammitt JK; Concannon TW; Auerbach HR; Fang C; Kent DM
    Health Econ; 2012 Mar; 21(3):238-51. PubMed ID: 22271512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?
    Shiroiwa T; Sung YK; Fukuda T; Lang HC; Bae SC; Tsutani K
    Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 19(4):422-37. PubMed ID: 19382128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graded pairs comparison - does strength of preference matter? Analysis of preferences for specialised nurse home visits for pain management.
    Bech M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kjaer T; Lauridsen J; Sørensen J
    Health Econ; 2007 May; 16(5):513-29. PubMed ID: 16960847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of willingness to pay to study values for pharmacotherapies for migraine headache.
    Lenert LA
    Med Care; 2003 Feb; 41(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 12555057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment.
    Ratcliffe J; Longworth L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 11987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Willingness to pay for a QALY.
    Gyrd-Hansen D
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1049-60. PubMed ID: 14673813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: an application of the discrete choice experiment.
    Roux L; Ubach C; Donaldson C; Ryan M
    Obes Res; 2004 Aug; 12(8):1342-51. PubMed ID: 15340118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.