574 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20143574)
1. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
Hjalmarsson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-level prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: a comparison with conventional abutment-level prostheses after 5 years of use.
Hjalmarsson L; Smedberg JI; Pettersson M; Jemt T
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 21479285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Material degradation in implant-retained cobalt-chrome and titanium frameworks.
Hjalmarsson L; Smedberg JI; Wennerberg A
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jan; 38(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 20673295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
Ortorp A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cellular responses to cobalt-chrome and CP titanium--an in vitro comparison of frameworks for implant-retained oral prostheses.
Hjalmarsson L; Smedberg JI; Aronsson G; Wennerberg A
Swed Dent J; 2011; 35(4):177-86. PubMed ID: 22372305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experiences with laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 10-year follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 17100745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks.
de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Dent; 2007 Oct; 35(10):800-5. PubMed ID: 17825466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical experiences with laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 5-year follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Linden B; Jemt T
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 10196830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Wendelhag I
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks supported by implants in the partially edentulous jaw: a 3-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Bergström C
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 11203643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implant suprastructures using cobalt-chromium alloy compared with gold alloy framework veneered with ceramic or acrylic resin: a retrospective cohort study up to 18 years.
Teigen K; Jokstad A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):853-60. PubMed ID: 21692856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
Eliasson A; Wennerberg A; Johansson A; Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
