These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20143975)

  • 21. Previous caesarean or vaginal delivery: which mode is a greater risk of perinatal death at the second delivery?
    Richter R; Bergmann RL; Dudenhausen JW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16846675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study of women preference regarding mode of delivery].
    Dimitrov A; Tsankova M; Krŭsteva K; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 15185524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.
    Nieminen K; Stephansson O; Ryding EL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 19488882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women.
    Pang MW; Lee TS; Leung AK; Leung TY; Lau TK; Leung TN
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17355362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's experiences and preferences following Caesarean birth.
    Dodd J; Pearce E; Crowther C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 15598289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors influencing delivery mode for nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation during a 17-year period.
    Sharma V; Colleran G; Dineen B; Hession MB; Avalos G; Morrison JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 19766377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin gestations > or =32 weeks according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Haest KM; Roumen FJ; Nijhuis JG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Nov; 123(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16260335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The differences between pregnant women who request elective caesarean and those who plan for vaginal birth based on Health Belief Model.
    Darsareh F; Aghamolaei T; Rajaei M; Madani A; Zare S
    Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):e126-e132. PubMed ID: 27293112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: choice of technique among antenatal attendees in North-eastern Nigeria.
    Bukar M; Kwari DY; Moruppa JY; Ndonya DN
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(8):822-5. PubMed ID: 21126121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maternal expectations and birth-related experiences: a survey of pregnant women of mixed parity from Calcutta, India.
    Hug I; Chattopadhyay C; Mitra GR; Kar Mahapatra RM; Schneider MC
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2008 Apr; 17(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18295472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Place of delivery among women who had antenatal care in a teaching hospital.
    Ekele BA; Tunau KA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):627-30. PubMed ID: 17464595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Believing in birth--choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women.
    Fenwick J; Gamble J; Hauck Y
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1561-70. PubMed ID: 17655545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
    Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Caesarean or normal vaginal delivery: overview of physicians' self-preference and suggestion to patients.
    Hantoushzadeh S; Rajabzadeh A; Saadati A; Mahdanian A; Ashrafinia N; Khazardoost S; Borna S; Maleki M; Shariat M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19052758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A prospective study on some factors which influence the delivery of large babies.
    Lawoyin TO
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1993 Dec; 96(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 8254713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What characterizes women in Norway who wish to have a caesarean section?
    Kringeland T; Daltveit AK; Møller A
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 37(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 19372232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms 1 year after first delivery: prevalence and the effect of childbirth.
    van Brummen HJ; Bruinse HW; van de Pol G; Heintz AP; van der Vaart CH
    BJU Int; 2006 Jul; 98(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 16831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevalence of vaginal infections with bacterial vaginosis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans among pregnant women at the Port Moresby General Hospital Antenatal Clinic.
    Klufio CA; Amoa AB; Delamare O; Hombhanje M; Kariwiga G; Igo J
    P N G Med J; 1995 Sep; 38(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 9522855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.