244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20144271)
1. Comparison of two oscillometric blood pressure monitors in subjects with atrial fibrillation.
Lamb TS; Thakrar A; Ghosh M; Wilson MP; Wilson TW
Clin Invest Med; 2010 Feb; 33(1):E54-62. PubMed ID: 20144271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring.
Pagonas N; Schmidt S; Eysel J; Compton F; Hoffmann C; Seibert F; Hilpert J; Tschöpe C; Zidek W; Westhoff TH
Hypertension; 2013 Sep; 62(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 23897073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blood pressure measurement in patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation using mercury sphygmomanometer and Omron HEM-750CP deice in the clinic setting.
Jani B; Bulpitt CJ; Rajkumar C
J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):543-5. PubMed ID: 16598291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Freeman P; Steel S; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Feb; 11(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16410738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T blood pressure monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.
Zhou Y; Xia JH; Zhang W; Li Y; Wang JG
Blood Press Monit; 2024 Aug; 29(4):217-220. PubMed ID: 38774977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the elderly with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Choi YK
Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 31714346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood pressure measurement in special populations and circumstances.
Stergiou GS; Dolan E; Kollias A; Poulter NR; Shennan A; Staessen JA; Zhang ZY; Weber MA
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Jul; 20(7):1122-1127. PubMed ID: 30003705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does atrial fibrillation affect the automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement?
Stergiou GS; Kollias A; Karpettas N
Hypertension; 2013 Nov; 62(5):e37. PubMed ID: 24060888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of patient simulators to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitors.
Sarhrani EM; Gilmore TB; Lamontagne AS; Harris LB; Kellett JS; Sweeney MP; Navas TI; Vesnovsky O; Ho C; Herbertson LH
Blood Press Monit; 2018 Oct; 23(5):225-229. PubMed ID: 29771693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response to "Does atrial fibrillation affect the automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement"?
Pagonas N; Westhoff TH
Hypertension; 2013 Nov; 62(5):e38. PubMed ID: 24288783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
