128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20145363)
1. [Effects of transmission scan protocol and attenuation correction method on normal database of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) brain positron emission tomography study].
Kobayashi M; Sugimoto K; Maruyama R; Tsujikawa T; Kudo T; Kiyono Y; Onoguchi M; Kawai K; Fujibayashi Y; Okazawa H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Jan; 66(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20145363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction.
Lonneux M; Borbath I; Bol A; Coppens A; Sibomana M; Bausart R; Defrise M; Pauwels S; Michel C
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10369944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of quantitative accuracy of the post-injection transmission-based and transmissionless attenuation correction techniques in neurological FDG-PET.
Kaneko K; Kuwabara Y; Sasaki M; Koga H; Abe K; Baba S; Hayashi K; Honda H
Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1095-102. PubMed ID: 15577587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps.
Delbeke D; Martin WH; Patton JA; Sandler MP
Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 11152796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET.
Visvikis D; Cheze-LeRest C; Costa DC; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 28(9):1326-35. PubMed ID: 11585291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas- and CT-Based Attenuation Correction.
Sekine T; Burgos N; Warnock G; Huellner M; Buck A; Ter Voert EE; Cardoso MJ; Hutton BF; Ourselin S; Veit-Haibach P; Delso G
J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1258-64. PubMed ID: 27013697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fundamental evaluation of segmented attenuation correction method for clinical FDG-PET studies: simulation of pulmonary mass lesions in phantom studies].
Matsumoto K; Mori H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Dec; 58(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 12577016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection.
Ramos CD; Erdi YE; Gonen M; Riedel E; Yeung HW; Macapinlac HA; Chisin R; Larson SM
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Feb; 28(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 11303885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain FDG PET study of normal aging in Japanese: effect of atrophy correction.
Yanase D; Matsunari I; Yajima K; Chen W; Fujikawa A; Nishimura S; Matsuda H; Yamada M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Jul; 32(7):794-805. PubMed ID: 15759148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occurrence of an artifact in brain 18F-FDG PET with calculated attenuation correction.
von Borczyskowski D; Schulte U; Brenner W; Clausen M; Buchert R
J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Dec; 34(4):232-4. PubMed ID: 17146113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Integrated PET/MR in Human Brain: Application of a Head Atlas and Comparison to True CT-Based Attenuation Correction.
Sekine T; Buck A; Delso G; Ter Voert EE; Huellner M; Veit-Haibach P; Warnock G
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26493207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) versus filtered back-projection for the assessment of myocardial glucose uptake and myocardial perfusion using dynamic PET.
Søndergaard HM; Madsen MM; Boisen K; Bøttcher M; Schmitz O; Nielsen TT; Bøtker HE; Hansen SB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 17033850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
