276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20145421)
1. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy.
Scanlon PH; Malhotra R; Thomas G; Foy C; Kirkpatrick JN; Lewis-Barned N; Harney B; Aldington SJ
Diabet Med; 2003 Jun; 20(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 12786681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 1-field, 2-fields, and 3-fields fundus photography for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy.
Lee JC; Nguyen L; Hynan LS; Blomquist PH
J Diabetes Complications; 2019 Dec; 33(12):107441. PubMed ID: 31668742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-mydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia?
Diamond JP; McKinnon M; Barry C; Geary D; McAllister IL; House P; Constable IJ
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9630290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies?
Owens DR; Gibbins RL; Lewis PA; Wall S; Allen JC; Morton R
Diabet Med; 1998 Feb; 15(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 9507921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effectiveness of detecting diabetic eye disease: diabetic retinal photography versus ophthalmic consultation.
Chia DS; Yap EY
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 15181522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using nonmydriatic ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) compared with ETDRS 7-field stereo photography.
Kernt M; Hadi I; Pinter F; Seidensticker F; Hirneiss C; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Neubauer AS
Diabetes Care; 2012 Dec; 35(12):2459-63. PubMed ID: 22912430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
