227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20145938)
1. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study.
Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
Cheung VY; Constantinescu OC; Ahluwalia BS
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1441-7. PubMed ID: 15498908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.
Cheung VY
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jul; 27(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 16100622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to measure thickness of the lower uterine segment at term.
Marasinghe JP; Senanayake H; Randeniya C; Seneviratne HR; Arambepola C; Devlieger R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 19682683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery: a prospective, pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study.
Seliger G; Chaoui K; Lautenschläger C; Riemer M; Tchirikov M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 29948165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation.
Ginsberg Y; Goldstein I; Lowenstein L; Weiner Z
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):214-7. PubMed ID: 23505018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section.
Sharma C; Surya M; Soni A; Soni PK; Verma A; Verma S
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2015 Apr; 65(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 25883440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
Kok N; Wiersma IC; Opmeer BC; de Graaf IM; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 23576473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound Assessment of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness During Pregnancy, Labour, and the Postpartum Period.
Fukuda M; Fukuda K; Shimizu T; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 27032737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations between sonographically measured and actual incision site thickness of lower uterine segment after repeated caesarean section.
Indraccolo U; Scutiero G; Matteo M; Mastricci AL; Barone I; Greco P
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 25909490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy.
Jastrow N; Gauthier RJ; Gagnon G; Leroux N; Beaudoin F; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):563.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20042176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.
Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Stepan H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 31068180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study.
Qureshi B; Inafuku K; Oshima K; Masamoto H; Kanazawa K
Tohoku J Exp Med; 1997 Sep; 183(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 9453117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
