These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20146774)

  • 1. The pursuit of optimal distinctiveness and consumer preferences.
    He L; Cong F; Liu Y; Zhou X
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Oct; 51(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 20146774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
    Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
    Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of personal values in Chinese consumers' food consumption decisions. A case study of healthy drinks.
    Lee PY; Lusk K; Mirosa M; Oey I
    Appetite; 2014 Feb; 73():95-104. PubMed ID: 24231428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer feedback can decrease consumers' willingness to pay for food: Evidence from a field experiment.
    Langer ML; Davidson KA; McFadden BR; Messer KD
    Appetite; 2022 Nov; 178():106162. PubMed ID: 35940337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer fears and familiarity of processed food. The value of information provided by the FTNS.
    Verneau F; Caracciolo F; Coppola A; Lombardi P
    Appetite; 2014 Feb; 73():140-6. PubMed ID: 24231427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.
    Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneity and nonlinearity in consumers' preferences: An application to the olive oil shopping behavior in Chile.
    Romo-Muñoz RA; Cabas-Monje JH; Garrido-Henrríquez HM; Gil JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184585. PubMed ID: 28892516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer Preferences and Socioeconomic Factors Decided on Plantain and Plantain-Based Products in the Central Region of Cameroon and Oyo State, Nigeria.
    Udomkun P; Masso C; Swennen R; Innawong B; Fotso Kuate A; Alakonya A; Lienou J; Ibitoye DO; Vanlauwe B
    Foods; 2021 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 34441732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Purchasing Context and Reversibility of Choice on Consumer Responses Toward Personalized Products and Standardized Products.
    Choi J; Lee DH; Taylor CR
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Apr; 118(2):510-26. PubMed ID: 27154376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perception of food quality. Profiling Italian consumers.
    Mascarello G; Pinto A; Parise N; Crovato S; Ravarotto L
    Appetite; 2015 Jun; 89():175-82. PubMed ID: 25681654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer preferences for electronic cigarettes: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Czoli CD; Goniewicz M; Islam T; Kotnowski K; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2016 Apr; 25(e1):e30-6. PubMed ID: 26490845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality traits and preferences for specialty coffee: Results from a coffee shop field experiment.
    Ufer D; Lin W; Ortega DL
    Food Res Int; 2019 Nov; 125():108504. PubMed ID: 31554119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products.
    Miranda-de la Lama GC; Estévez-Moreno LX; Sepúlveda WS; Estrada-Chavero MC; Rayas-Amor AA; Villarroel M; María GA
    Meat Sci; 2017 Mar; 125():106-113. PubMed ID: 27940228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer Acceptance of Population-Level Intervention Strategies for Healthy Food Choices: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Perceived Fairness.
    Bos C; Lans IV; Van Rijnsoever F; Van Trijp H
    Nutrients; 2015 Sep; 7(9):7842-62. PubMed ID: 26389949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer input for developing human food products made with sorghum grain.
    Vázquez-Araújo L; Chambers E; Cherdchu P
    J Food Sci; 2012 Oct; 77(10):S384-9. PubMed ID: 22978447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumers' perception of organic product characteristics. A review.
    Schleenbecker R; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():420-9. PubMed ID: 24012637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.