These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20147476)

  • 1. Are reporting standards of diagnostic test evaluation unrealistic?
    Lassere M
    J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 20147476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Error message.
    Vaux DL
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):799. PubMed ID: 15103350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
    Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.
    Goodman S; Greenland S
    PLoS Med; 2007 Apr; 4(4):e168. PubMed ID: 17456002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [New guidelines for better documentation of survey methodology and results].
    Lindstedt G; Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 7-13; 102(10):748, 750, 752-3. PubMed ID: 15839166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A philosophical perspective supports the need for patient-outcome studies in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Sonke GS; Verbeek AL; Kiemeney LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18619792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Design and analysis of a study on reliability and validity of diagnostic tests in urological clinical research].
    Fernández Pérez C; Moreno Sierra J; Barreales Tolosa L; Ramírez de Molina V
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 12958999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical Analysis and Reporting Guidelines for CHEST.
    Kattan MW; Vickers AJ
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S3-S11. PubMed ID: 32658650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publishing nutrition research: validity, reliability, and diagnostic test assessment in nutrition-related research.
    Gleason PM; Harris J; Sheean PM; Boushey CJ; Bruemmer B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Mar; 110(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 20184991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard operating procedures.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1299. PubMed ID: 17093453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) checklist to the 2007 Transfusion article 'Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Chagas antibody in US blood donors'.
    Lucey C; Weina PJ
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2008 Feb; 102(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 18082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
    Moher D
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 56(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19247756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Validity of diagnostic tests].
    Valenzuela D L; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Mar; 136(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 18575669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.