170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20147581)
1. Disparate outcomes from applying U.K. and U.S. osteoporosis treatment guidelines.
Bolland MJ; Grey A
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2010 Apr; 95(4):1856-60. PubMed ID: 20147581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of applying the NOF, NOGG and Taiwanese guidelines to a cohort of Chinese early postmenopausal women.
Cheung E; Kung AW; Tan KC
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2014 Feb; 80(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 24010883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA.
Dawson-Hughes B; Tosteson AN; Melton LJ; Baim S; Favus MJ; Khosla S; Lindsay RL;
Osteoporos Int; 2008 Apr; 19(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 18292975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the NOGG and NOF Guidelines on the Indication of Bone Mineral Density in Routine Clinical Practice.
Kyriakos G; Vidal-Casariego A; Fernández-Martínez MN; Blanco-Suárez MD; Ballesteros-Pomar MD; Cano-Rodríguez I
J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 26343823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoporosis Management in a Real Clinical Setting: Heterogeneity in Intervention Approach and Discrepancy in Treatment Rates when Compared with the NOGG and NOF Guidelines.
Kyriakos G; Vidal-Casariesgo A; Quiles-Sánchez LV; Urosa-Maggi JA; Calleja-Fernández A; Hernández-Moreno A; Ballesteros-Pomar MD; Cano-Rodriguez I
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2016 Sep; 124(8):466-473. PubMed ID: 27219881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the NOF and NOGG guidelines for spinal radiographic examination in postmenopausal Chinese women.
Chen R; Liu S; Huang M; Ding N; Wang Q; Xie Z; Liu H; Sheng Z; Ou Y
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Jan; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 33399996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of three population-based strategies for fracture prevention: results of the osteoporosis population-based risk assessment (OPRA) trial.
Lacroix AZ; Buist DS; Brenneman SK; Abbott TA
Med Care; 2005 Mar; 43(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15725986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population.
Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T
Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of low BMD for 1-year fracture outcomes is similar for postmenopausal women ages 50-64 and 65 and Older: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).
Siris ES; Brenneman SK; Miller PD; Barrett-Connor E; Chen YT; Sherwood LM; Abbott TA
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1215-20. PubMed ID: 15231007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of FRAX-based osteoporosis intervention using real world data.
Goldshtein I; Ish-Shalom S; Leshno M
Bone; 2017 Oct; 103():318-324. PubMed ID: 28778597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment implications for men when switching from male to female bone mineral density reference data: the Manitoba Bone Density Program.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 24090643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of guidelines for secondary prevention of fracture and the FRAX index in patients with fragility fracture].
Naranjo A; Ojeda-Bruno S; Francisco-Hernández F; Erausquin C; Rúa-Figueroa I; Rodríguez-Lozano C
Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Mar; 136(7):290-2. PubMed ID: 21185575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimates of the proportion of older white women who would be recommended for pharmacologic treatment by the new U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines.
Donaldson MG; Cawthon PM; Lui LY; Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Taylor BC; Cauley JA; Hillier TA; Black DM; Bauer DC; Cummings SR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2009 Apr; 24(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 19049330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009.
Balasubramanian A; Tosi LL; Lane JM; Dirschl DR; Ho PR; O'Malley CD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e52. PubMed ID: 24695929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme.
Brankin E; Mitchell C; Munro R;
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Apr; 21(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 15899094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inadequate dietary calcium intake in elderly patients with hip fractures.
Lee YH; Lim YW; Ling PS; Tan YY; Cheong M; Lam KS
Singapore Med J; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1117-21. PubMed ID: 18043839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.
Kanis JA; Oden A; Johnell O; Jonsson B; de Laet C; Dawson A
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 11444092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New treatment approach for osteopenia.
Tufts G
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2011; 56(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 21323852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.
Chang KP; Center JR; Nguyen TV; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Apr; 19(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 15005838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Usefulness of FRAX tool for the management of osteoporosis in the Spanish female population].
Azagra Ledesma R; Prieto-Alhambra D; Encabo Duró G; Casado Burgos E; Aguyé Batista A; Díez-Pérez A;
Med Clin (Barc); 2011 May; 136(14):613-9. PubMed ID: 21349558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
