748 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20147705)
1. Can the states nullify health care reform?
Jost TS
N Engl J Med; 2010 Mar; 362(10):869-71. PubMed ID: 20147705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. California dreamin'--state health care reform and the prospect for national change.
Isaacs SL; Schroeder SA
N Engl J Med; 2008 Apr; 358(15):1537-40. PubMed ID: 18403762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states.
King M
State Legis; 2012; 38(7):46-7. PubMed ID: 22893930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care reform and abortion.
Randall S
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():58-76. PubMed ID: 16767842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How many Justices does it take to change the U.S. health system? Only one, but it has to want to change.
Sage WM
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):27-33. PubMed ID: 22976410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons to improve the efficiency and equity of health reform.
Pauly MV
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):21-4. PubMed ID: 22976408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Baucus bill and the hope for reform.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 2009 Oct; 361(18):e36. PubMed ID: 19828524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Historic passage--reform at last.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 2010 Apr; 362(14):e48. PubMed ID: 20335573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Health Policy Tracking Service, A service of Thomson Reuters/West
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 21370540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandated benefits.
; Karberg J
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 22416296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State sovereign standing: often overlooked, but not forgotten.
Cuccinelli KT; Getchell ED; Russell WG
Stanford Law Rev; 2012 Jan; 64(1):89-124. PubMed ID: 22363959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health reform and the Supreme Court: the ACA survives the battle of the broccoli and fortifies itself against future fatal attack.
Ouellette A
Albany Law Rev; 2012-2013; 76(1):87-119. PubMed ID: 23577375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Miller KG
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 20217929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing national health reform in North Carolina.
Searing A; Linker A
N C Med J; 2010; 71(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 20681503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandated benefits. Issue brief.
Karberg J
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Dec; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 23297477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care reform--a Republican view.
Grassley C
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(25):2397-9. PubMed ID: 19923559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Battle for authority. GOP governors want insurance exchange control.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2011 Feb; 41(7):10. PubMed ID: 21446635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Awaiting orders from the court.
Daly R
Mod Healthc; 2011 Mar; 41(12):42, 44. PubMed ID: 21516624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Getting to the real issues in health care reform.
Ginsburg PB
N Engl J Med; 2009 Nov; 361(22):2107-9. PubMed ID: 19907036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Affordable Care Act litigation: the Supreme Court and the future of health care reform.
Gostin LO; Garcia KK
JAMA; 2012 Jan; 307(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 22274682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
