These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20148010)
1. Did the bunny sell or sully the story on toxicity testing? Backmann J Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7282):729. PubMed ID: 20148010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European Commission responds to chemical testing story. English M Nature; 2010 May; 465(7297):420. PubMed ID: 20505708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A less toxic solution. Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):129-30. PubMed ID: 16280988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Data gaps threaten chemical safety law. Gilbert N Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7355):150-1. PubMed ID: 21753825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Crucial data on REACH not disclosed. Gilbert N Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7292):1116-7. PubMed ID: 20414283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicity testing gets a makeover. Abbott A Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7261):158. PubMed ID: 19741676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Streamlined chemical tests rebuffed. Gilbert N Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Race is on to find alternative to animal tests. Goodman S Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):116. PubMed ID: 12110854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicity testing moves from the legislature to the petri dish-and back. Gura T Cell; 2008 Aug; 134(4):557-9. PubMed ID: 18724925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The patchwork of toxicological research for pharmaceutical testing. von Aulock S ALTEX; 2010; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 20397314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How omics technologies can contribute to the '3R' principles by introducing new strategies in animal testing. Kroeger M Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 16782220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals. Greim HA Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 19034432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal testing: more than a cosmetic change. Abbott A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):144-6. PubMed ID: 16281001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH. Scialli AR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Letter to the editor: a regulatory view on the discussion on the role of alternative methods in the risk assessment of chemicals in the context of REACH. Gundert-Remy U; Bernauer U; Madle S; Oberemm A; Schulte A; Richter-Reichhelm HB Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19002668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative method of assessing toxicity. Atterwill CK Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 43():1-9. PubMed ID: 7550636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment. Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of toxicokinetics to improve chemical risk assessment: implications for the use of animals. Creton S; Billington R; Davies W; Dent MP; Hawksworth GM; Parry S; Travis KZ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 55(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 19665509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some thoughts on the use of replacement alternatives for toxicity testing and risk assessment. Combes RD Arch Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 83(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19212756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]