147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20148100)
1. Automatic measurement of epithelium differentiation and classification of cervical intraneoplasia by computerized image analysis.
Jondet M; Agoli-Agbo R; Dehennin L
Diagn Pathol; 2010 Jan; 5():7. PubMed ID: 20148100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Keenan SJ; Diamond J; McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Thompson D; Bartels PH; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2000 Nov; 192(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 11054719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
Yang B; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang X; Burchette R; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18485462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative histopathological analysis of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia sections: methodological issues.
Guillaud M; Cox D; Malpica A; Staerkel G; Matisic J; Van Niekirk D; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin N; Follen M; MacAulay C
Cell Oncol; 2004; 26(1-2):31-43. PubMed ID: 15371655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in the topological expression of markers of differentiation and apoptosis in defined stages of human cervical dysplasia and carcinoma.
Zanotti S; Fisseler-Eckhoff A; Mannherz HG
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jun; 89(3):376-84. PubMed ID: 12798698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between nuclear/cytoplasmic area ratio and classification of cervical smears.
Athanassiadou P; Kavantzas N; Gonidi M; Athanassiades P; Liossi A; Nakopoulou L; Petrakakou E; Davaris P
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 11876540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic imaging of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia based on hematoxylin and eosin fluorescence.
Castellanos MR; Szerszen A; Gundry S; Pirog EC; Maiman M; Rajupet S; Gomez JP; Davidov A; Debata PR; Banerjee P; Fata JE
Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():119. PubMed ID: 26204927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Rosamilia C; Feichter G; Tzankov A; Obermann EC
Pathologe; 2012 Mar; 33(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 22350168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytometric evidence that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and II are dysplasias rather than true neoplasias. An image analysis study of factors involved in the progression of cervical lesions.
Mariuzzi G; Santinelli A; Valli M; Sisti S; Montironi R; Mariuzzi L; Alberti R; Pisani E
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Apr; 14(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 1590897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AgNOR protein quantity of cervical smears correlates with that of histological sections in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Pelusi G; Trerè D; Formelli G; Rinaldi AM; Derenzini M
Eur J Histochem; 1997; 41(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 9271702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Characteristics of invisible cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ under colposcopy].
Chen Q; Du H; Wang C; Tang JL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):172-177. PubMed ID: 29609231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. p16(INK4a) immunostaining as an alternative to histology review for reliable grading of cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Dijkstra MG; Heideman DA; de Roy SC; Rozendaal L; Berkhof J; van Krimpen K; van Groningen K; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):972-7. PubMed ID: 20924035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ki-67 quantitative evaluation as a marker of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection.
Mimica M; Tomić S; Kardum G; Hofman ID; Kaliterna V; Pejković L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jan; 20(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 20130511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of confocal fluorescence microscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sheikhzadeh F; Ward RK; Carraro A; Chen ZY; van Niekerk D; Miller D; Ehlen T; MacAulay CE; Follen M; Lane PM; Guillaud M
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Oct; 14():96. PubMed ID: 26499452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A fusion-based approach for uterine cervical cancer histology image classification.
De S; Stanley RJ; Lu C; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):475-87. PubMed ID: 24075360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fascin expression in cervical normal squamous epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and superficially invasive (stage IA1) squamous carcinoma of the cervix.
Koay MH; Crook M; Stewart CJ
Pathology; 2014 Aug; 46(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 24977742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic efficacy of computer extracted image features in optical coherence tomography of the precancerous cervix.
Kang W; Qi X; Tresser NJ; Kareta M; Belinson JL; Rollins AM
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 21361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mean nuclear volume in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma.
Dey P; Powari M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2002 Apr; 24(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 12026052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ki-67 immunoquantitation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a sensitive marker for grading.
Kruse AJ; Baak JP; de Bruin PC; Jiwa M; Snijders WP; Boodt PJ; Fons G; Houben PW; The HS
J Pathol; 2001 Jan; 193(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11169515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its modulation during an alpha-difluoromethylornithine chemoprevention trial.
Boiko IV; Mitchell MF; Hu W; Pandey DK; Mathevet P; Malpica A; Hittelman WN
Clin Cancer Res; 1998 Jun; 4(6):1383-91. PubMed ID: 9626454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
