146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20148135)
1. Influence of prosthetic screw material on joint stability in passive and non-passive implant-supported dentures.
Spazzin AO; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Mesquita MF
Open Dent J; 2009 Dec; 3():245-9. PubMed ID: 20148135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.
Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 24423456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro comparison of joint stability of implant-supported fixed prosthetic suprastructures retained with different prosthetic screws and levels of fit under masticatory simulation conditions.
Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Pantoja JM; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):833-8. PubMed ID: 22848885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Loosening torque of prosthetic screws in metal-ceramic or metal-acrylic resin implant-supported dentures with different misfit levels.
Bacchi A; Paludo L; Ferraz Mesquita M; Schuh C; Federizzi L; Oro Spazzin A
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1358-62. PubMed ID: 23477791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of retorque on loosening torque of prosthetic screws under two levels of fit of implant-supported dentures.
Spazzin AO; Henrique GE; Nóbilo MA; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Mesquita MF
Braz Dent J; 2010 Jan; 21(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20464315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type.
Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating.
Bacchi A; Regalin A; Bhering CL; Alessandretti R; Spazzin AO
J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Oct; 7(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 26576253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Screw Surface Treatment on Retention of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
de Moura MB; Rodrigues RB; Pinto LM; de Araújo CA; Novais VR; Júnior PCS
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Aug; 43(4):254-260. PubMed ID: 28628390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant Volume Loss, Misfit, Screw Loosening, and Stress In Custom Titanium and Zirconia Abutments.
Barbosa SA; Bacchi A; Barão VAR; Silva-Souza YT; Bruniera JF; Caldas RA; Consani RLX
Braz Dent J; 2020 Sep; 31(4):374-379. PubMed ID: 32901712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
Barbin T; Velôso DV; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Mesquita MF
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103821. PubMed ID: 32469723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misfit simulation on implant-supported prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases: Part 3: A radiographic evaluation.
Rutkunas V; Kules D; Mischitz I; Huber S; Revilla-León M; Larsson C; Janda M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38418304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of welding techniques in the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported prostheses.
Rodrigues SA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Consani RLX; Nóbilo MAA; Mesquita MF
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Sep; 78():435-442. PubMed ID: 28576006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit.
Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparative analysis of the fit of gold alloy or commercially pure titanium implant-supported prostheses before and after electroerosion.
Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF; Francischone CE; de Mattos Mda G
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15295321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature.
Katsoulis J; Takeichi T; Sol Gaviria A; Peter L; Katsoulis K
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10 Suppl 1():121-138. PubMed ID: 28944373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.
Stüker RA; Teixeira ER; Beck JC; da Costa NP
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19089290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses transmitted to implants from metal frameworks.
de Torres EM; Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1735-9. PubMed ID: 21497352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
