These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20149519)

  • 41. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is There a Future for Nuclear Power? Wind and Emission Reduction Targets in Fossil-Fuel Alberta.
    van Kooten GC; Duan J; Lynch R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165822. PubMed ID: 27902712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of nuclear power on CO₂ emission from power plant sector in Iran.
    Kargari N; Mastouri R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Jan; 18(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 21061076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The climate footprint: a practical tool to address climate change.
    Janse T; Wiers P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 17851216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
    Johnson JM; Franzluebbers AJ; Weyers SL; Reicosky DC
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Nov; 150(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 17706849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: scoping methods.
    Smith KR; Haigler E
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2008; 29():11-25. PubMed ID: 18173381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and Japan: sector-specific estimates and managerial and economic implications.
    Hayami H; Nakamura M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Oct; 85(2):371-92. PubMed ID: 17126990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A new approach to achieve a reduction in energy costs in Dutch hospitals.
    van't Hof IR
    Health Estate J; 1996 Jun; 50(5):8, 10-1. PubMed ID: 10159014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An inexact dynamic optimization model for municipal solid waste management in association with greenhouse gas emission control.
    Lu HW; Huang GH; He L; Zeng GM
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):396-409. PubMed ID: 18096299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sustainable energy towards air pollution and climate change mitigation.
    Adedeji AR; Zaini F; Mathew S; Dagar L; Petra MI; De Silva LC
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():109978. PubMed ID: 32090795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dynamic linear modeling of monthly electricity demand in Japan: Time variation of electricity conservation effect.
    Honjo K; Shiraki H; Ashina S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196331. PubMed ID: 29708988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Climate change mitigation by recovery of energy from the water cycle: a new challenge for water management.
    van der Hoek JP
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 22173417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The right place for the right job in the photovoltaic life cycle.
    Kawajiri K; Genchi Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7415-21. PubMed ID: 22668319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sustainable power generation through decarbonization in the power generation industry.
    Ziyaei S; Panahi M; Manzour D; Karbasi A; Ghaffarzadeh H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Dec; 195(1):225. PubMed ID: 36562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know?
    Weber CL; Jiaramillo P; Marriott J; Samaras C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1895-901. PubMed ID: 20131782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of cost and environmental load of fluorocarbon recovery and destruction system based on fluorocarbon stock distribution.
    Tachibana J; Goto N; Fujie K
    Environ Technol; 2007 May; 28(5):499-509. PubMed ID: 17615959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Incorporating land-use requirements and environmental constraints in low-carbon electricity planning for California.
    Wu GC; Torn MS; Williams JH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2013-21. PubMed ID: 25541644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Greenhouse gas emissions from operating reserves used to backup large-scale wind power.
    Fripp M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 45(21):9405-12. PubMed ID: 21797198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The nuclear energy outlook--a new book from the OECD nuclear energy agency.
    Yoshimura U
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21399406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.