BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20150441)

  • 21. Moving from good to great in ambulatory electronic health record implementation.
    McAlearney AS; Song PH; Robbins J; Hirsch A; Jorina M; Kowalczyk N; Chisolm D
    J Healthc Qual; 2010; 32(5):41-50. PubMed ID: 20854358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality measurement of medication monitoring in the "meaningful use" era.
    Tjia J; Field TS; Fischer SH; Gagne SJ; Peterson DJ; Garber LD; Gurwitz JH
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Sep; 17(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 21902449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SeReM2--a meta-model for the structured definition of quality requirements for electronic health record services.
    Hoerbst A; Hackl W; Ammenwerth E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):744-8. PubMed ID: 20841785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring the performance of electronic health records: a case study in residential aged care in Australia.
    Yu P; Qian S; Yu H; Lei J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1035. PubMed ID: 23920809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indicators of data quality: revision of a guideline for networked medical research.
    Stausberg J; Pritzkuleit R; Schmidt CO; Schrader T; Nonnemacher M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():711-5. PubMed ID: 22874284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Challenges in data quality assurance for electronic health records.
    Shabestari O; Roudsari A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():37-41. PubMed ID: 23388250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review.
    Dean BB; Lam J; Natoli JL; Butler Q; Aguilar D; Nordyke RJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2009 Dec; 66(6):611-38. PubMed ID: 19279318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A semiotic view on paper and mobile care data quality.
    De La Harpe R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():442-6. PubMed ID: 22874229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An explicit quality indicator set for measurement of quality of care in patients with cirrhosis.
    Kanwal F; Kramer J; Asch SM; El-Serag H; Spiegel BM; Edmundowicz S; Sanyal AJ; Dominitz JA; McQuaid KR; Martin P; Keeffe EB; Friedman LS; Ho SB; Durazo F; Bacon BR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Aug; 8(8):709-17. PubMed ID: 20385251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.
    Logan JR; Lieberman DA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):717-34. PubMed ID: 20889074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Completeness, accuracy, and computability of National Quality Forum-specified eMeasures.
    Amster A; Jentzsch J; Pasupuleti H; Subramanian KG
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 25326598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
    Gordon DB; Pellino TA; Miaskowski C; McNeill JA; Paice JA; Laferriere D; Bookbinder M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2002 Dec; 3(4):116-30. PubMed ID: 12454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Alternative measures of electronic health record adoption among hospitals.
    Blavin FE; Buntin MJ; Friedman CP
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):e293-301. PubMed ID: 21322296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating quality of dental care among patients with diabetes: Adaptation and testing of a dental quality measure in electronic health records.
    Neumann A; Kalenderian E; Ramoni R; Yansane A; Tokede B; Etolue J; Vaderhobli R; Simmons K; Even J; Mullins J; Kumar S; Bangar S; Kookal K; White J; Walji M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Sep; 148(9):634-643.e1. PubMed ID: 28624074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration.
    Kupersmith J; Francis J; Kerr E; Krein S; Pogach L; Kolodner RM; Perlin JB
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):w156-68. PubMed ID: 17259199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Quality assessment of medical care--a standardized scheme for the development of quality indicators].
    Zorn U; Ollenschläger G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Mar; 93(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10355061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring health care performance now, not tomorrow: essential steps to support effective health reform.
    Roski J; McClellan M
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Apr; 30(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 21471489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What constitutes high quality of care for adults with epilepsy?
    Pugh MJ; Berlowitz DR; Montouris G; Bokhour B; Cramer JA; Bohm V; Bollinger M; Helmers S; Ettinger A; Meador KJ; Fountain N; Boggs J; Tatum WO; Knoefel J; Harden C; Mattson RH; Kazis L
    Neurology; 2007 Nov; 69(21):2020-7. PubMed ID: 17928576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.