BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20150815)

  • 1. The attendance of migrant women at the national breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 1997-2008.
    Vermeer B; Van den Muijsenbergh ME
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2010 May; 19(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 20150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening participation among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: exploring reasons for nonattendance.
    Hartman E; van den Muijsenbergh ME; Haneveld RW
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Sep; 18(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 19581808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence.
    Martín-López R; Hernández-Barrera V; De Andres AL; Garrido PC; De Miguel AG; García RJ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2010 May; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 20110817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening in two multicultural family practice teaching clinics.
    Lubish L; Greenberg S; Friger M; Shvartzman P
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Aug; 3(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 11519382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Nationwide breast cancer screening fully accomplished; results from the implementation phase 1990-1997. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1124-9. PubMed ID: 10876708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uptake of breast cancer screening in women aged over 75 years: a controversy to come?
    Eisinger F; Viguier J; Blay JY; Morère JF; Coscas Y; Roussel C; Pivot X
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S13-5. PubMed ID: 21245673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The scientific basis for population screening for breast cancer in the Netherlands].
    de Koning HJ; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; Rutgers EJ; van der Maas PJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jun; 146(22):1034-41. PubMed ID: 12073506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance.
    Gram IT; Lund E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18416955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Initial results with breast screening in the Enschede area. I. Effectiveness].
    Boekema AG; Dornseiffen G; Mulder HJ; de Vos RA; Kluft-de Haas BA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Sep; 136(36):1757-60. PubMed ID: 1407125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hormone replacement therapy, mammography screening and changing age-specific incidence rates of breast cancer: an ecological study comparing two European populations.
    Verkooijen HM; Koot VC; Fioretta G; van der Heiden M; Schipper ME; Rapiti E; Peeters PH; Peterse JL; Bouchardy C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Feb; 107(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 17431760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [French screening program of breast cancer. Results from 5 districts (1989-1994)].
    Séradour B; Allemand H; Schaffer P
    Bull Cancer; 1997 Aug; 84(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 9339188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast complaints during the Dutch nationwide breast cancer screening program: increased risk of referral and of breast cancer].
    van Bon-Martens MJ; Klingenberg H; Dijkstra HA; Peeters PH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jun; 145(22):1067-71. PubMed ID: 11414168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Appalachian women.
    Hall HI; Uhler RJ; Coughlin SS; Miller DS
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 11815412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.