These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151236)

  • 1. Gated blood-pool SPECT versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
    Harel F; Finnerty V; Grégoire J; Thibault B; Marcotte F; Ugolini P; Khairy P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20151236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiofocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Pelletier-Galarneau M; Finnerty V; Tan S; Authier S; Gregoire J; Harel F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29520572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT: comparison with planar gated blood-pool imaging and assessment of repeatability in patients with heart failure.
    Wright GA; Thackray S; Howey S; Cleland JG
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 12679390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT.
    Schaefer WM; Lipke CS; Standke D; Kühl HP; Nowak B; Kaiser HJ; Koch KC; Buell U
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1256-63. PubMed ID: 16085580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lipke CS; Kühl HP; Nowak B; Kaiser HJ; Reinartz P; Koch KC; Buell U; Schaefer WM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Apr; 31(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 14722679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Daou D; Harel F; Helal BO; Fourme T; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Mariano-Goulart D; Faraggi M; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11438625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation of the EXINI heart software package.
    Winz OH; Meyer PT; Knollmann D; Lipke CS; Kühl HP; Oelve C; Schaefer WM
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19076730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Assessment of biventricular function using gated blood pool SPECT with QBS software: comparison with planar radionuclide ventriculography].
    Nakajo H; Kumita S; Cho K; Mizumura S; Toba M; Fukushima Y; Oshina T; Kumazaki T
    Kaku Igaku; 2002 Nov; 39(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 12607234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of gated SPECT, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes.
    Demir H; Tan YZ; Kozdag G; Isgoren S; Anik Y; Ural D; Demirci A; Berk F
    Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 18059128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT.
    Daou D; Van Kriekinge SD; Coaguila C; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Sitbon O; Parent F; Slama M; Le Guludec D; Simonneau G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 15173776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical validation of the gated blood pool SPECT QBS processing software in congestive heart failure patients: correlation with MUGA, first-pass RNV and 2D-echocardiography.
    Hacker M; Hoyer X; Kupzyk S; La Fougere C; Kois J; Stempfle HU; Tiling R; Hahn K; Störk S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16328851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model dependence of gated blood pool SPECT ventricular function measurements.
    Nichols K; Humayun N; De Bondt P; Vandenberghe S; Akinboboye OO; Bergmann SR
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 15173775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of right and left ventricular function by quantitative blood-pool SPECT (QBS): comparison with conventional methods and quantitative gated SPECT (QGS).
    Odagiri K; Wakabayashi Y; Tawarahara K; Kurata C; Urushida T; Katoh H; Satoh H; Hayashi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Oct; 20(8):519-26. PubMed ID: 17134018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of a completely automatic ECG gated blood pool SPECT processing method for the estimation of global systolic left ventricular function.
    Daou D; Coaguila C; Benada A; Razzouk M; Haidar M; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Slama M; Guludec DL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 15094446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction from Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Processed with "Myovation Evolution": Comparison of Three Automated Software Packages using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance as Reference.
    Calandri E; Guana F; Pultrone M; Leuzzi S; Chiorino G; Soligo E; Frantellizzi V; Gallina S; Liberatore M; De Vincentis G
    Curr Radiopharm; 2021; 14(2):112-120. PubMed ID: 32933466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of gated blood pool SPECT and multi-detector row computed tomography for measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with atypical chest pain: validation with radionuclide ventriculography.
    Kim IJ; Choo KS; Lee JS; Kim SJ; Kim JH; Kim YK; Kim DS; Cho HJ
    Cardiology; 2007; 107(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT.
    Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Kim YK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005; 21(2-3):261-6. PubMed ID: 16015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction.
    Raja S; Mittal BR; Santhosh S; Bhattacharya A; Rohit MK
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1156-61. PubMed ID: 25144559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in the Indian population.
    Ballal S; Patel CD; Singla S; Sharma P; Narang R; Sharma G; Malhotra A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1160-8. PubMed ID: 22955186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.