BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151636)

  • 1. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms.
    Mi B; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2022-8. PubMed ID: 20151636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
    Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced gypsum scaling by organic fouling layer on nanofiltration membrane: Characteristics and mechanisms.
    Wang J; Wang L; Miao R; Lv Y; Wang X; Meng X; Yang R; Zhang X
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():203-13. PubMed ID: 26799710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gypsum scaling in pressure retarded osmosis: experiments, mechanisms and implications.
    Zhang M; Hou D; She Q; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():387-95. PubMed ID: 24156948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antiscalant removal in accelerated desupersaturation of RO concentrate via chemically-enhanced seeded precipitation (CESP).
    McCool BC; Rahardianto A; Cohen Y
    Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):4261-71. PubMed ID: 22673342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis.
    Lutchmiah K; Cornelissen ER; Harmsen DJ; Post JW; Lampi K; Ramaekers H; Rietveld LC; Roest K
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(7):1443-9. PubMed ID: 22179641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of forward osmosis membrane technology for oil sands process-affected water desalination.
    Jiang Y; Liang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(8):1809-16. PubMed ID: 27120634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
    Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications.
    Jin X; Tang CY; Gu Y; She Q; Qi S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2323-30. PubMed ID: 21329347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved calcium sulfate recovery from a reverse osmosis retentate using eutectic freeze crystallization.
    Randall DG; Mohamed R; Nathoo J; Rossenrode H; Lewis AE
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 23128631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of the methanogenic landfill leachate with thin open channel reverse osmosis membrane modules.
    Li F; Wichmann K; Heine W
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):960-4. PubMed ID: 18693005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reverse osmosis desalting of inland brackish water of high gypsum scaling propensity: kinetics and mitigation of membrane mineral scaling.
    Rahardianto A; McCool BC; Cohen Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jun; 42(12):4292-7. PubMed ID: 18605546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short- and long-term fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membrane at full scale leachate treatment plant.
    Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Srisukphun T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22173416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.