These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151636)

  • 21. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scale formation in NF/RO: mechanism and control.
    Lee S; Lee CH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):267-75. PubMed ID: 16003986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Water reuse: >90% water yield in MBR/RO through concentrate recycling and CO2 addition as scaling control.
    Joss A; Baenninger C; Foa P; Koepke S; Krauss M; McArdell CS; Rottermann K; Wei Y; Zapata A; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6141-51. PubMed ID: 21959090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Membrane scaling and flux decline during fertiliser-drawn forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater.
    Phuntsho S; Lotfi F; Hong S; Shaffer DL; Elimelech M; Shon HK
    Water Res; 2014 Jun; 57():172-82. PubMed ID: 24721664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies.
    Kinnunen P; Kyllönen H; Kaartinen T; Mäkinen J; Heikkinen J; Miettinen V
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Apr; 2017(1):194-205. PubMed ID: 29698234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
    Li ZY; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Valladares-Linares R; Li Q; Zhan T; Amy G
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 22094000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
    Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of antiscalant addition on calcium carbonate precipitation for a simplified synthetic brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Greenlee LF; Testa F; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2010 May; 44(9):2957-69. PubMed ID: 20350741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
    Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis.
    Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH
    Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Calcium Sulfate and Calcium Carbonate Scaling of Thin-Film Composite Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes with Surface-Tethered Polyacrylic Acid Chains.
    Chen Y; Cohen Y
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36557193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. RO filtration of biologically treated textile and dyeing effluents using ozonation as a pre-treatment.
    Wang HY; Guan YT; Mizuno T; Tsuno H
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 20729575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes.
    Hancock NT; Black ND; Cath TY
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 22209275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dissolution kinetics of polycrystalline calcium sulfate-based materials: influence of chemical modification.
    Fisher RD; Mbogoro MM; Snowden ME; Joseph MB; Covington JA; Unwin PR; Walton RI
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2011 Sep; 3(9):3528-37. PubMed ID: 21861513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vacuum membrane distillation of seawater reverse osmosis brines.
    Mericq JP; Laborie S; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5260-73. PubMed ID: 20659753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Critical flux and chemical cleaning-in-place during the long-term operation of a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Wei CH; Huang X; Ben Aim R; Yamamoto K; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):863-71. PubMed ID: 20947121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates.
    Pérez-González A; Urtiaga AM; Ibáñez R; Ortiz I
    Water Res; 2012 Feb; 46(2):267-83. PubMed ID: 22119366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of surfactants influencing attachment of a Mycobacterium sp. to cellulose acetate and aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes.
    Campbell P; Srinivasan R; Knoell T; Phipps D; Ishida K; Safarik J; Cormack T; Ridgway H
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Sep; 64(5):527-44. PubMed ID: 10404233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.