These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151773)

  • 1. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.
    Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
    Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.
    Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Yu J; Schachner HC; Simmons DA; Chu A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 22746838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a novel test strip technology for blood glucose monitoring: accuracy at hypoglycaemic glucose levels.
    Bellary S; Cameron H; Macleod K; Malecha M; Koria K; Raja P; Cabezudo JD; Ellison J
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 98(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 23063304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.
    Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Liebing C; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 29291625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of blood glucose meters in compliance with current and future clinical ISO15197 accuracy criteria.
    Pfützner A; Hengesbach C; Demircik F; Schipper C; Forst T; Musholt PB
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2014 Feb; 30(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 24156775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. System accuracy evaluation of systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose: a comparison of a patient-use system with six professional-use systems.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Link M; Stolberg E; Haug C; Sieber J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 52(7):1079-86. PubMed ID: 24681433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.
    Pardo S; Shaginian RM; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 May; 12(3):650-656. PubMed ID: 29542346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.