These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151877)
21. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech. Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Audiovisual synchrony perception for music, speech, and object actions. Vatakis A; Spence C Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1111(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 16876772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release. Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The effect of different types of music on the perception of speech information]. Tsaneva L; Danev S Probl Khig; 1995; 20():116-21. PubMed ID: 8524734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report. Wilson RH; Strouse A J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Masking effect of music upon oral information processing. Tsaneva L Cent Eur J Public Health; 2003 Sep; 11(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 14514173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception. Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming. Allen K; Carlile S; Alais D J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes. Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech. Wu X; Wang C; Chen J; Qu H; Li W; Wu Y; Schneider BA; Li L Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phase effects on the masking of speech by harmonic complexes: variations with level. Green T; Rosen S J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2876-83. PubMed ID: 24116424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]