These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20151930)

  • 1. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 20151930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users.
    Marriage J; Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 15250124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC; Marriage J
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 14974623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth.
    Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Stone MA; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):741-53. PubMed ID: 20672875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.
    Wesselkamp M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kiessling J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):73-5. PubMed ID: 11318489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some aspects of auditory space, speech perception and the use of hearing aids.
    Martin MC; Stevenson PW; Grover BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):141-61. PubMed ID: 292140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. On-line gain control in a digital hearing aid.
    Launer S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 12916699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.