These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20152667)
1. Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporary anchorage devices. Kau CH; English JD; Muller-Delgardo MG; Hamid H; Ellis RK; Winklemann S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):166.e1-5; discussion 166-7. PubMed ID: 20152667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on the stability of temporary anchorage devices in adults: a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Falkensammer F; Rausch-Fan X; Arnhart C; Krall C; Schaden W; Freudenthaler J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 25263143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography. Jung YR; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 23374923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage. Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Chen YJ; Chang HH; Lin HY; Lai EH; Hung HC; Yao CC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1188-96. PubMed ID: 18983323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Baumgaertel S; Hans MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Shinohara A; Motoyoshi M; Uchida Y; Shimizu N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography. Miyazawa K; Kawaguchi M; Tabuchi M; Goto S Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 20413451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla. Kim GT; Kim SH; Choi YS; Park YJ; Chung KR; Suk KE; Choo H; Huang JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):628.e1-10; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 19892272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Park HS; Lee YJ; Jeong SH; Kwon TG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18174068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporary anchorage devices for tooth movement: a review and case reports. McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Gallerano RL J Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 77(10):1613-24. PubMed ID: 17032102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporary Anchorage Device Misplaced into Infratemporal Space - A Case Report. Kumar RM; Dutta S; Handique S; Sateesh CP Indian J Dent Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 38934757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Watanabe H; Deguchi T; Hasegawa M; Ito M; Kim S; Takano-Yamamoto T Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Feb; 16(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 23311659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns. Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yabuuchi T; Ando R; Roberts WE; Garetto LP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):889-97. PubMed ID: 18538254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementum, pulp, periodontal ligament, and bone response after direct injury with orthodontic anchorage screws: a histomorphologic study in an animal model. Dao V; Renjen R; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD; Maganzini AL; Kraut RA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2440-5. PubMed ID: 19837314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Hashimoto T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S68-73. PubMed ID: 17448389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Park J; Cho HJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]