119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20152685)
1. Methods for managing 3-dimensional volumes.
Othman AA; El-Beialy AR; Fawzy SA; Kandil AH; El-Bialy AM; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 20152685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.
Macchi A; Carrafiello G; Cacciafesta V; Norcini A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 16679200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration.
Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kang SH; Zhengguo P; Yi CK; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 20591700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overjet at the anterior and posterior segments: three-dimensional analysis of arch coordination.
Kook YA; Bayome M; Park SB; Cha BK; Lee YW; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 19413384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New clinical classification of dental arch form using facial axis points derived from three-dimensional models.
Bayome M; Han SH; Choi JH; Kim SH; Baek SH; Kim DJ; Kook YA
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 22372267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction.
Lehmann TM; Hemler PF; Webber RL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 12058267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
Ghanai S; Marmulla R; Wiechnik J; Mühling J; Kotrikova B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis.
Byland J
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Establishment of normal value of posterior arch length of adolescence in Chengdu].
Liu C; Cao Y; Zhao Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 21(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 12898765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion.
Kim BI; Bayome M; Kim Y; Baek SH; Han SH; Kim SH; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e253-60. PubMed ID: 21392669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
