BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20152931)

  • 1. Comparing risks of alternative medical diagnosis using Bayesian arguments.
    Fenton N; Neil M
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Aug; 43(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 20152931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is informed consent in cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention achievable?
    Larobina ME; Merry CJ; Negri JC; Pick AW
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 17610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21.
    Nicolaides KH; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Avgidou K; Papageorghiou A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 16098850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disclosure of information and informed consent: ethical and practical considerations.
    Steinberg A
    J Child Neurol; 2009 Dec; 24(12):1568-71. PubMed ID: 19509408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management in the dental office.
    Pollack BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Jul; 29(3):557-80. PubMed ID: 3861400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical malpractice: a case study in medical and legal decision making.
    Piccirillo M; Graf GJ
    Yale J Biol Med; 1989; 62(1):23-42. PubMed ID: 2728499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
    Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
    Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?
    Rimer BK; Briss PA; Zeller PK; Chan EC; Woolf SH
    Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5 Suppl):1214-28. PubMed ID: 15316908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent in the Pakistani milieu: the physician's perspective.
    Jafarey AM; Farooqui A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; 31(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 15681673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
    Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Sharma G; Davis J; Gross S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18355783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal risks in treating irritable bowel syndrome.
    Feld AD
    Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2003; 3 Suppl 3():S25-31. PubMed ID: 14502114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared decision making in critical care: a clinical reality and an ethical necessity.
    Karlawish JH
    Am J Crit Care; 1996 Nov; 5(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 8922153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical communication in clinical trials. Issues faced by data managers in obtaining informed consent.
    Loh WY; Butow PN; Brown RF; Boyle F
    Cancer; 2002 Dec; 95(11):2414-21. PubMed ID: 12436450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Bayesian-utilitarian and maximin principle approaches.
    Comba P; Martuzzi M; Botti C
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 15212224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent.
    Lescale KB; Inglis SR; Eddleman KA; Peeper EQ; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8688110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore.
    Feld AD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):977-80. PubMed ID: 15180712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.