BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20154407)

  • 1. Prospective electrocardiogram-gated axial 64-detector computed tomographic angiography vs retrospective gated helical technique to assess coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Machida H; Masukawa A; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Suzuki K; Ueno E; Kodera K; Nakano K; Shen Y
    Circ J; 2010 Apr; 74(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 20154407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.
    Chazen JL; Prince MR; Yip R; Min JK; Weinsaft JW; Henschke CI; Cham MD
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1122-7. PubMed ID: 20542451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Qin J; Liu LY; Fang Y; Zhu JM; Wu Z; Zhu KS; Zhang JS; Shan H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):945-51. PubMed ID: 22745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
    Maruyama T; Takada M; Hasuike T; Yoshikawa A; Namimatsu E; Yoshizumi T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.
    Zhao L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Yang L; Du J
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 19783395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography to assess coronary artery bypass grafts--comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Lee YW; Yang CC; Mok GS; Law WY; Su CT; Wu TH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49212. PubMed ID: 23145126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility.
    Willmann JK; Weishaupt D; Kobza R; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):568-77. PubMed ID: 15215552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
    Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.
    Goetti R; Leschka S; Baumüller S; Plass A; Wieser M; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Falk V; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Feuchtner G
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 20404735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.
    Hausleiter J; Meyer TS; Martuscelli E; Spagnolo P; Yamamoto H; Carrascosa P; Anger T; Lehmkuhl L; Alkadhi H; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M; Hein F; Bischoff B; Kuse M; Schömig A; Achenbach S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 May; 5(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 22595156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
    Shuman WP; Branch KR; May JM; Mitsumori LM; Lockhart DW; Dubinsky TJ; Warren BH; Caldwell JH
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 18552312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
    Lee JH; Chun EJ; Choi SI; Vembar M; Lim C; Park KH; Choi DJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 27(5):657-67. PubMed ID: 21678128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: Radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT.
    Lee AM; Engel LC; Shah B; Liew G; Sidhu MS; Kalra M; Abbara S; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U; Ghoshhajra BB
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(3):172-183.e2. PubMed ID: 22542280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating.
    Xu L; Yang L; Zhang Z; Li Y; Fan Z; Ma X; Lv B; Yu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: influence of imaging direction with 64-slice dual-source CT.
    Lee SK; Jung JI; Ko JM; Lee HG
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 24661825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality.
    Ippolito D; Fior D; Franzesi CT; Riva L; Casiraghi A; Sironi S
    Radiol Med; 2017 Dec; 122(12):893-901. PubMed ID: 28849537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.