These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20155230)

  • 21. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Sasse M; Krummel A; Klosa K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):907-15. PubMed ID: 26051232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vitro study of the compressive load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with varying thickness of veneer porcelain.
    Webber B; McDonald A; Knowles J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12616235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers on Teeth with Different Preparation Depths.
    Tuğcu E; Vanlıoğlu B; Özkan YK; Aslan YU
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(Suppl):s87–s95. PubMed ID: 29513770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [An in vitro study of the fracture strength of tooth preparations for Empress 2 veneers and crowns and mandibular incisors restored with Empress 2 veneers and crowns].
    Wei X; Li Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 27(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 20077896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture strength of minimally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service.
    Skouridou N; Pollington S; Rosentritt M; Tsitrou E
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):e70-7. PubMed ID: 23618556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
    Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.
    Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns.
    Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Abbas G; Richter B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Dec; 14(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17205955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tensile bond strength of ceramic crowns to dentin using resin cements.
    Simon JF; de Rijk WG; Hill J; Hill N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 22324222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up.
    Gresnigt MM; Kalk W; Ozcan M
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 23534025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns.
    Ma PS; Nicholls JI; Junge T; Phillips KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 19782825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs.
    Alghazzawi TF; Lemons J; Liu PR; Essig ME; Janowski GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 23217471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
    Guess PC; Stappert CF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.