BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20155790)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
    Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.
    Stelfox HT; Goverman J
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1488-93. PubMed ID: 19077647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
    Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials.
    Al-Hajeri AA; Fedorowicz Z; Amin FA; Eisinga A
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Apr; 27(4):526-30. PubMed ID: 16598332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
    Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overview of studies of treatments for hand eczema-the EDEN hand eczema survey.
    Van Coevorden AM; Coenraads PJ; Svensson A; Bavinck JN; Diepgen TL; Naldi L; Elsner P; Williams HC;
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 151(2):446-51. PubMed ID: 15327553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
    Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004.
    Galandi D; Schwarzer G; Antes G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():30. PubMed ID: 16824217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials.
    Papanikolaou PN; Ioannidis JP
    Am J Med; 2004 Oct; 117(8):582-9. PubMed ID: 15465507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
    Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation.
    Pengel LH; Barcena L; Morris PJ
    Transpl Int; 2009 Apr; 22(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 19000234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials.
    Silber S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art?
    Moss RL; Henry MC; Dimmitt RA; Rangel S; Geraghty N; Skarsgard ED
    J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1182-6. PubMed ID: 11479852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.